You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Runspotrun ago 

  1. I am a Patriot, let me be very clear of that AND a supporter of POTUS as the greatest President in US history
  2. Your analysis fails for the following reason: consider a man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet. He goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and blows his head off at point blank range. The neighbor is dead. Your logic would imply otherwise. Furthermore, China + Russia + Iran + NK have enough firepower to successfully achieve the CABAL's objective: laying siege to the only nation currently preventing a global NWO headed by a single man of evil origin. Nukes + ground invasion. China and Russia's nuclear subs combined are a potent force. It only takes a few nukes to destroy most of the US population centers.
  3. I fully agree with your assessment re. a first strike scenario, and heartily recommend that strategy. It is the only one that could plausibly deter the scenario I lay out above. However, POTUS is unlikely to employ it. He has his hands full and likely believes he can achieve his objectives through economic means. The West has lost sight of the true Marxist mentality, one that is very much at the heart of not only China but also Russia. They want to rule. They will for a brief time. So yes, first strike on China--carried out right away on the entire country--is required, but will never be carried out.
    This is not an outcome I seek, but rather one I see unavoidable. POTUS has control of the US, not of our adversaries who already possess US tech. Russia, for instance, has ALL of our secrets, including the location of our nukes, a secret known only by a small number of people.

0
0

[–] TSE [S] ago 

And by the way, I did not endorse the first-strike scenario coming from the US. What I am saying is that if China does the first-strike they can't possibly hit all of our ICBMs, so the second-strike coming from the US will utterly fry China.

0
1

[–] Runspotrun 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

  1. Endorse it or not, it is the only possible alternative if the objective is to stop China dead in its tracks. However, the drastic nature of the act will ensure it is never acted upon
  2. China, as I have stated, already will NOT act alone. They will be joined, as they are at this very moment in history, by Russia, Iran and NK, among other satellite nations (Cuba, Nicaragua, Mexico) with ONE SINGLE objective in mind: destroy the "evil United States" since we are the only nation standing in their way.
  3. China has advanced tech and Russia knows as many of our secrets as POTUS. They have infiltrated every aspect of the US government, thanks to Clinton, Obama and other greedy politicians. Russia knows the location of every nuke we possess and will strike these sites first.
  4. What happens to China? I do not know. I presume our subs will strike and take out numerous high-density population centers. But they could care less. 50 million less mouths to feed is a Chinese made to order fortune cookie wrapped in a bow. Same with Iran, but their motives are slightly different. If they all die, they believe they will enter paradise with the pleasure of countless virgins, rather than the hell to which they will be sent.

0
0

[–] TSE [S] ago 

Your analysis fails for the following reason.

In your scenario:

the man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and blows his head off at point blank range. The neighbor is dead.

In my scenario:

the man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and is met by the whole family each pointing a AR15 holding 100 rounds at him. The man backs off.

0
1

[–] Runspotrun 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We are on the SAME side, and I agree with you from a strategic point of view entirely, as the response you portray is ideal.

The point I was making however was simply that the raw number of weapons, in and of itself, is an insufficient indicator of killing power.

Russia + China + Iran + NK have sufficient power, when employing a 'special teams' scenario such as 9/11 but on a larger scale to shake the very foundation of the US

Do I want this? No

My point is merely that, as originally stated, POTUS is a gift from God, one that is temporary and not yet final in terms of the victory over evil

Evil will have its hour, however brief it may be relative to eternity