Both admit that the whistleblower complaint essentially was "hearsay," and is not "corroborated by other folks" and that the Whistleblower has ‘Arguable Political Bias’ against Trump", but then say that the Complaint Is Still ‘Credible’. Maguire, "when I saw this report and complaint, immediately I knew that this was a serious matter,".
So now we have arrived at a time where made up stuff that is not corroborated makes you a criminal.
God safe as all!!
Another point, people say why did Pelosi call for impeachment before she even got the call transcript and whistleblower report. Well she didn't, she and Shiff, already had the whistleblower report. It was a planned hit!!!
view the rest of the comments →
[–] FirstDamsel 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Of course it is. You bring up a great point-why was the complaint considered "credible" when the accusations were all "hearsay" AND included Fake News just like the Russia dossier? My o nly guess is the fact that the "Whistleblower" angle forced the IG & Maguire to act but the hearsay is why it wasn't deemed urgent. Either way it has Dem stink all over it.