I'm still reading the book "The Inheritance" and it has me thinking of how EVIL the Deep State was and is, and how much has been kept from us and how much we were lied to. The info of JFK's assassination was suppose to be made public by October 26, 2017 but wasn't. President Trump thinks it's TOO DANGEROUS to let us know the TRUTH. I'm not sure what he thinks would happen, but there must be some really bad things in those records that he thinks we wouldn't be able to deal with, and the security of our country would be affected. I wish JFK jr wasn't killed because our world would probably be a MUCH BETTER PLACE BY NOW. He was going to come out with the TRUTH.
Q came out 2 days after we were suppose to be told. I think Q knew we would need help in ANOTHER WAY since the truth was held from us, and possibly Q would help us figure out the truth little by little. WE have learned a lot from Q and I appreciate ALL Q's help. I hope 8CHAN comes back soon so Q can continue to help us.
"The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, or the JFK Records Act, is a public law passed by the United States Congress, effective October 26, 1992. It directed the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to establish a collection of records to be known as the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection. It stated that the collection shall consist of copies of ALL U.S. GOVERNMENT RECORDS relating to the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and that they are to be housed in the NARA Archives II building in College Park, Maryland. The collection also included any materials created or made available for use by, obtained by, or otherwise came into the possession of any state or local law enforcement office that provided support or assistance or performed work in connection with a federal inquiry into the assassination.
The final report of the Act's Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) partially credited the conclusions in Oliver Stone's 1991 film JFK with the passage of the Act. The ARRB stated that the film "popularized a version of President Kennedy's assassination that featured U.S. government agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the military as conspirators."
The Act requires that each assassination record be PUBLICLY DISCLOSED IN FULL and be made available in the collection NO LATER than the date that is 25 years after the date of enactment of the Act (which was OCTOBER 26, 2017), unless the President of the United States certifies that: (1) continued postponement is made necessary by an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations; and (2) the identifiable harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.
The definition of "assassination record" was left broad by the Act and determined in practice by the ARRB; a final definition was published in the Federal Register on June 28, 1995. The basic definition was:
An assassination record includes, but is not limited to, all records, public and private, regardless of how labeled or identified, that document, describe, report on, analyze, or interpret activities, persons, or events reasonably related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and investigations of or inquiries into the assassination.
THIS ARTICLE IS FROM APRIL 2018
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump boasted last fall that he would open all remaining John F. Kennedy assassination records. So far, Trump hasn’t made good on the “great transparency” he promised then.
Trump announced on Thursday that the public must wait ANOTHER THREE YEARS OR MORE before seeing material that must remain classified for NATIONAL SECURITY REASONS — more than five decades after Kennedy was killed Nov. 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas.
The National Archives released its last batch of more than 19,000 records on Thursday. But an undisclosed amount of material remains under wraps because Trump said the POTENTIAL HARM to U.S. national security, law enforcement or foreign affairs is “OF SUCH GRAVITY that it outweighs the public interest in immediate disclosure.”
He ordered the CIA and other agencies to take yet another look at each blacked-out section of their documents during the next three years to see what more can be released.
https://www.apnews.com/2f48d57f9ee045d98eb784d2295288ef
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Also remember that Q emerged in the aftermath of the Las Vegas event. Personally I do not buy Q's version that this was a "failed attempt" on the president involving a Saudi prince
There is ample evidence that this entire production was a hoax in which no one died. Fake victims and obituaries. Obvious crisis actors. Sheriff Lombardo caught in multiple lies. Medical Examiner lying. Hospitals lying. Corrupt FBI releasing a bullshit "report"
I just don't buy it
[–] redtoe_skipper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What makes you think one op cannot be disguised in another?
The people acting on these issues are not like you and me. For us, most things if not all, are really straight forward in an either/ or situation. They grey area is reasonably small. You need a certain twist in your brain. This is about appearances, manipulation, entrapment, etc.
Even Q said, not all they were doing would be clean. War is dirty. It necessitates disguise.
Information, being a piece of data or an act, may be true or fake. If fake, then it still can be true, as it value is in the reason why the fake was done. This is the world of shadows.
Then there is another, may be even disquieting thought: if you wanne win, you want to win with full spectrum domination. It means you will time each and any piece of data, so it works to your advantage. If you want your enemy to fall, you want to have them fall from as high up as you can manipulate them, in the nick of time.
Consider a tennis match. If the opponent is too strong from the get go, it simply is game set match. But a more enticing and entertaining match is one where the tension regarding a win is in play.
I play this game while playing tennis. It is fun. Especially, when I play against opponents who claim to be people not having a problem with losing..... hahaha, you should see their frustration. And the more frustrated they get, the more mistakes they make, the easier the game gets. But ... the game must be played, till the arbiter declares: game, set, match.
A tennis match is just small stuff, compared to what Q+ is doing.
As towards LV: people react to noise (sound of shots) and what they see: the appearance of wounds .... Another thought: what if there was a mix: one or two were actually wounded, surrounded by crisis actors to provoke an effect?
How do you escape best? When things are orderly? Or when things are in disarray and panic?
What happens when one op goes south? How do you stop-gap that? How do you tie off?
When an operator turns out to be a [C]lown, which side is he on? Does he even know which side was manipulating him? What was the op really about?
I have many questions, and suspicious as to any official narrative, because there are too many pieces not fitting in place.
[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Being from the Netherlands you should investigate Anders Breivik. Another false flag hoax
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2016/04/anders-breivik-omar-bin-laden-adam-lanza.html