You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[–]Vozlo0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Trump has earned the benefit of the doubt, but AG Barr really hasnt. In light of the many departed appointees who later proved themselves to be probable establishment/swamp creatures (Scaramucci, McMasters, Tillerson), I think it's defensible to reserve judgement and maintain skepticism of pretty much everyone else in Washington D.C. I regrettably trusted George W. Bush to do the right thing, despite obvious misgivings, largely out of an intense aversion to his political opposition. I don't want to make that same mistake again.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] pby ago
Trust is earned, not implicitly given.
[–] Vozlo ago (edited ago)
Trump has earned the benefit of the doubt, but AG Barr really hasnt. In light of the many departed appointees who later proved themselves to be probable establishment/swamp creatures (Scaramucci, McMasters, Tillerson), I think it's defensible to reserve judgement and maintain skepticism of pretty much everyone else in Washington D.C. I regrettably trusted George W. Bush to do the right thing, despite obvious misgivings, largely out of an intense aversion to his political opposition. I don't want to make that same mistake again.
[–] pby ago
Hear, hear!