You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Still relevant this week, or are you trying to memory hole this? People can be brought up on multiple charges,the excuses I've heard to justify this inaction do not make sense to me.
They didn't have enough evidence of his intent to break the law???? WTF is that? He was the head of the FBI so I guess he didn't know what he was doing? Sounds like the faulty reason given for why HRC wasn't prosecuted. Meanwhile, I want to use that line on the next policeman who pulls me over for speeding. Officer, how can you charge me with speeding? That wasn't my intent. Do you have adequate evidence that it was?? Pure BS.
I'm not a lawyer so perhaps I need enlightened. I understand the law as it pertains to double jeopardy...you can't be tried twice for the same crime. But if a person perpetrated multiple crimes, can't they be tried for each separately? Or grouped together in a multi-count indictment? So, why can't Comey be indicted on each of the crimes he committed?
I don't agree. If grouped together there's only one chance for conviction. Separately, there are multiple bites of the apple and it would cost him far more for his legal defense. I'd like to see him go totally broke, then sent to prison for the rest of his life or to the gallows if that be his sentence.
Word on the street is he's rolling it into conspiracy charges (conspiracy = to overthrow the US government), along with the FISA fraud and other conduct misbehaviors
Also, Comey's conduct in social media is baiting him to further implicate himself as a bad guy in the eyes of a jury
muh,muh,barr,. if you were barr, would you believe anything the FBI told you? obviously there exists a huge struggle between DOJ and FBI. anons know this, sure IG can point the finger, DOJ could file a case, but the Evidence comes from the FBI, geez people, figure it out, we got moles inside both agencies making it impossible to confirm evidence. havent we over the last 3 yrs figured that out? barr is playing a longer game,if pardons are in place(whole other subject) then New crimes must be found ,investigated,indicted for. most of this wont happen before the election,however the pedo arrests and drying up of human trafficking Will continue,a subject we all know has gone into overdrive.remember no-one with anything to lose can publicly be opposed to those arrests. thats the beauty of the plan.JMHO
[–]TurquoiseLover0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Put it this way, if you hit and ran and killed 1 person would the government just ignore so they could prosecute you for the 10 people you hit and ran a mile down the road??? I don't think so.
Sort: Top
[–] 1scm 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
small fry charges compared to what;s coming. He wont get a break.
[–] NannyOnline 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Dan Bongino had an interesting theory.
What he did could be difficult to prosecute because he gave them to his personal lawyer, protected under client-attorney privileges.
More severe charged to come, for example perhaps involved in a coup to overthrow to assassinate Trump. Nevermind the mis-handling of paper.
[–] Intlrnt2 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
This was news last week.
[–] GritD2 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Still relevant this week, or are you trying to memory hole this? People can be brought up on multiple charges,the excuses I've heard to justify this inaction do not make sense to me.
[–] Intlrnt2 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
So is the Mueller Report and his subsequent testimony.
I didn’t realize your post was the genesis of a comprehensive aggregation of past news that is still relevant this week.
Accept my apologies. You have initiated a monumental task.
I look forward to future edits that flesh this work out.
[–] CMAnon 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
They didn't have enough evidence of his intent to break the law???? WTF is that? He was the head of the FBI so I guess he didn't know what he was doing? Sounds like the faulty reason given for why HRC wasn't prosecuted. Meanwhile, I want to use that line on the next policeman who pulls me over for speeding. Officer, how can you charge me with speeding? That wasn't my intent. Do you have adequate evidence that it was?? Pure BS.
I'm not a lawyer so perhaps I need enlightened. I understand the law as it pertains to double jeopardy...you can't be tried twice for the same crime. But if a person perpetrated multiple crimes, can't they be tried for each separately? Or grouped together in a multi-count indictment? So, why can't Comey be indicted on each of the crimes he committed?
[–] Mscss ago
Grouped together in a multi-count indictment is what I’m hoping for.
[–] CMAnon ago
I don't agree. If grouped together there's only one chance for conviction. Separately, there are multiple bites of the apple and it would cost him far more for his legal defense. I'd like to see him go totally broke, then sent to prison for the rest of his life or to the gallows if that be his sentence.
[–] RoBatten 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnDdLrm6esg
Great explanation of why Comey would walk if prosecuted on the leaks. Barr knows this.
[–] ghost_of_aswartz ago
Word on the street is he's rolling it into conspiracy charges (conspiracy = to overthrow the US government), along with the FISA fraud and other conduct misbehaviors
Also, Comey's conduct in social media is baiting him to further implicate himself as a bad guy in the eyes of a jury
[–] ZombiClown ago
muh,muh,barr,. if you were barr, would you believe anything the FBI told you? obviously there exists a huge struggle between DOJ and FBI. anons know this, sure IG can point the finger, DOJ could file a case, but the Evidence comes from the FBI, geez people, figure it out, we got moles inside both agencies making it impossible to confirm evidence. havent we over the last 3 yrs figured that out? barr is playing a longer game,if pardons are in place(whole other subject) then New crimes must be found ,investigated,indicted for. most of this wont happen before the election,however the pedo arrests and drying up of human trafficking Will continue,a subject we all know has gone into overdrive.remember no-one with anything to lose can publicly be opposed to those arrests. thats the beauty of the plan.JMHO
[–] TurquoiseLover ago (edited ago)
Put it this way, if you hit and ran and killed 1 person would the government just ignore so they could prosecute you for the 10 people you hit and ran a mile down the road??? I don't think so.