You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Regarding Google's initiative, beyond the nefarious aspects of it, I think society probably needs to look slightly differently at the concept of plagiarism in CURRENT_YEAR when technology enables nearly the sum total of human knowledge to be available instantly. This is nothing new: technology has brought forth a lot of changes in education.
Aren't math courses taught differently in CURRENT_YEAR than they were 100 years ago before pocket calculators were commonplace?
Aren't "penmanship" classes essentially obsolete with the written word no longer nearly as important?
Aren't typing classes basically obsolete now that everybody grows up typing?
For example, aren't there already maybe 100,000,000 High School papers about Abraham Lincoln written in the last century? Does it make sense to use technology to ensure that the #100,000,001 paper on him is unique? It seems like a waste of effort as there's only so many ways you can reword the same basic facts over and over again.
I'm not sure that I have an actual answer here, but this feels like a waste of technology, and I'd suspect that part of the real reason is the dumbing down towards the least common denominator. Many niggers and spics probably copy shit verbatim (when they bother to do an assignment at all) so every part of society has to change to accommodate their presence.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] cdglow ago
Regarding Google's initiative, beyond the nefarious aspects of it, I think society probably needs to look slightly differently at the concept of plagiarism in CURRENT_YEAR when technology enables nearly the sum total of human knowledge to be available instantly. This is nothing new: technology has brought forth a lot of changes in education.
For example, aren't there already maybe 100,000,000 High School papers about Abraham Lincoln written in the last century? Does it make sense to use technology to ensure that the #100,000,001 paper on him is unique? It seems like a waste of effort as there's only so many ways you can reword the same basic facts over and over again.
I'm not sure that I have an actual answer here, but this feels like a waste of technology, and I'd suspect that part of the real reason is the dumbing down towards the least common denominator. Many niggers and spics probably copy shit verbatim (when they bother to do an assignment at all) so every part of society has to change to accommodate their presence.