Archived POTUS tweets "gaga." He's telling us Lady Gaga is involved with Epstein. She's going down! (mobile.twitter.com)
submitted ago by 19810708321b
Posted by: 19810708321b
Posting time: 1.4 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 10/13/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1243
SCP: 57
62 upvotes, 5 downvotes (93% upvoted it)
Archived POTUS tweets "gaga." He's telling us Lady Gaga is involved with Epstein. She's going down! (mobile.twitter.com)
submitted ago by 19810708321b
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19810708321b [S] 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
Of all the words to use? He chooses Gaga?
[–] toobaditworks 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
He is talking about the texts with Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. Gaga in love means crazy in love. Crazy lovers.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gaga
It means crazy.
example:
[–] angelCole 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I disagree. I don't think he has ever used that term to describe comms between the lovers. It seems calculated and a message for us.
[–] DickTick 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
good luck... I've already tried to point this out multiple times.. that if we actually searched all of the crazy words he's used to describe their dumbass relationship it would make this entire post look retarded, but I guarantee you by tomorrow you'll start hearing people trash Gaga because the president used an age-old word to describe exactly what he was describing and some random single person tried to find a code in it and this is where we are..
it's a shame, but this shit happens so often around here it's gotten stupid at this point.. and all it does is poison the truths we have found, have uncovered, and all of the hard work that the autists have done to come up with actual verifiable proof of all of their claims.
Real anons immediately let you know when they're about to speculate versus when they have concrete sources and proof.. the rest of these idiots are the polar opposite nothing but a strain on our movement and actual researchers....
[–] 19810708321b [S] ago
I know what it means. It's just not the word to use right then of all the words to pick.
[–] Joe10jo 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
No shit! I’m 48 and have never had a reason to use that word, neither do my kids, and I guarantee ya a man of Trump’s caliber says it for a very specific reason. He’s calling her out.
[–] divine_human ago
gaga is a pretty common word. i sense that in case he really wanted to point to 'lady gaga', he would have used a capital G.