You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] MaverickWolf ago 

What branch is the least pozzed of them all?

It's hard to say, but I'll say this: it all starts from home, leading by example and being a shepherd for lost lambs.

Semitic shit has never been a good influence for Europeans.

That's debatable. Why do you think so? Keep in mind, jews aren't even semitic. "Anti-semitism!", cries the wolf in sheep's clothing. They are pros at crypsis, and will swiftly and cunningly assume any identity that suits their ends. That's where the "fellow white people" meme comes from.

0
0

[–] NarrativeControl ago 

Yup, I'm "redpilled" on Jews.

I'm going with the Islamic invasion in Europe and the introduction of Christianity in the Roman Empire (and it's consequent downfall) as the two most damaging Semitic influences across European history. If there's anything of worth from Semitic influence then it's offset by those (and many others) events.

They brought foreign influence, infighting, miscegenation and confusion.

I don't like it one bit. But I'd be saying the same shit about Han culture if the chinks had taken the role Semites took.

0
0

[–] MaverickWolf ago  (edited ago)

I'll never defend Islam. The problem with it is that it sucks. It preaches war and conquest yet it's precepts create societies that systematically lose wars. Try to imagine Iran going to war with orthodox Rusia.

About the Roman Empire... I'm not well versed in it's history, but from what I gather from a quick search, its fall was preceded by feminism and utter debauchery. Rome was already on its way to the bin of failed societies due to a mix of economic and social reasons. Can you cite any sources that prove that the majority of romans were actually practicing a christian way of life? Can you explain how christianity contributed to the fall? I think you're giving it way too much credit.