You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] MolochHunter [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If Guccifer2 is a Russian, what's his real identity? Is it in the report? On what evidence did Mueller establish this? Why didn't Mueller subpoena Guccifer? How does Mueller's take reconcile with Podesta's own email saying he suspected an INSIDER

0
7

[–] nevergiveup2them 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

He didn't. And he took crowdstrikes word that it was Russia. It was the CIA that made it look like the Russians to cover for the inside job. It will come out.

1
5

[–] EarnYourVote 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Right - I have yet to see anyone try to refute Binney's transfer bandwidth argument that completely destroys the idea of an outside hack of the DNC.

0
1

[–] MolochHunter [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

well if he's taking crowdstrikes word then he is a fucking black hat

im guessing Q only ever told us otherwise to lull Mueller into a sense of security

0
2

[–] QDPie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Read the Mark Levin thread on here today. He's got it right. Volume 2 is an essay by Mueller and is NOT a legal document. Mueller needs to shut up before he digs his grave even deeper. And Wes Hubbell's daughter needs to shut up as well, or she'll be singing in Sing Sing.

0
2

[–] HelloDolly 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Just thinking out loud here. What if Mueller was supposed to put that in there to put the Seth Rich theory into the mainstream? Most people don't really understand what the entire theory actually is. They go out of their way to say "By then, it was no secret where the documents came from. The computer security firm CrowdStrike had already published its technical report on the DNC breach, which laid out a trail leading directly to Moscow and the GRU." To me, that statement begs the question even from a normie, "Why are they letting Crowdstrike make that determination?" I think this part of the Mueller report is more stage setting. It seems far fetched to me that Mueller would set pins like this up that are pretty easily knocked down. Coupled with Barr going out of his way to distinguish publishing stolen information from participating in stealing information, I smell a set up. Could be wrong. I go back and forth on the RR/Mueller thing once or twice daily.

0
2

[–] QDPie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

good point. We keep forgetting what the NPC's don't know. I said, "Well, Seth Rich needs to be factored in here..." to a couple of normies the other day and they said, "Seth who?" Sigh. Try to catch up!

0
1

[–] MolochHunter [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

i know what yer saying, but i dont think the 'bring Seth Rich to public awareness' is a strong or clear enough motive for a set up. It would be something far more pragmatic and concrete.

if there's a set up it may be more likely something to increase leverage to make the UK hand Assange over to testify - or to lull the Brits into thinkng it wont result in a big embarrassment for them when all the dirt is public and the Brits involvement in a soft coup attempt against a SUPPOSED ALLY is laid bare

0
1

[–] deepstatebug 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I stopped reading the BS 'report' after I read 'Guccifer'. Tracy Beanz spent much time on this

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=kB0zCpNGhVE

0
1

[–] MolochHunter [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

very forensic. Tracey does herself a credit there