Check out this from garbage brokers Daily Beast (note: i havent read the Mueller report to know if the Beast are accurately reporting Mueller's allegations in the report - this article didnt provide links or reference which pages in the 400 page report it might be found in)
https://www.thedailybeast.com/mueller-report-julian-assange-smeared-seth-rich-to-cover-for-russians?ref=home
"Julian Assange not only knew that a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer wasn’t his source for thousands of hacked party emails, he was in active contact with his real sources in Russia’s GRU months after Seth Rich’s death. At the same time he was publicly working to shift blame onto the slain staffer “to obscure the source of the materials he was releasing,” Special Counsel Robert Mueller asserts in his final report on Russia’s role in the 2016 presidential election.
“After the U.S. intelligence community publicly announced its assessment that Russia was behind the hacking operation, Assange continued to deny that the Clinton materials released by WikiLeaks had come from Russian hacking,” the report reads. “According to media reports, Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”
Thursday’s long-anticipated release adds new details about Assange’s interactions with the officers in Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate. Still, it leaves one question unanswered: Why was Assange so determined to exonerate the Russian intelligence agents who gave him the material?
As laid out by Mueller, Assange’s involvement in Russia’s election interference began with a June 14, 2016 direct message to WikiLeaks’ Twitter account from “DC Leaks,” one of the false fronts created by the Russians to launder their hacked material.
“You announced your organization was preparing to publish more Hillary's emails,” the message read, according to Mueller’s report. “We are ready to support you. We have some sensitive information too, in particular, her financial documents. Let's do it together. What do you think about publishing our info at the same moment? Thank you.”
A week later, WikiLeaks reached out to a second GRU persona, Guccifer 2.0, and pitched WikiLeaks as the best outlet for the hacked material. On July 14, 2016, GRU officers used a Guccifer 2.0 email address to send WikiLeaks an encrypted one-gigabyte file named “wk dnc link I .txt.gpg.” Assange confirmed receipt, and on July 22 he published 20,000 DNC emails stolen during the GRU’s breach.
By then, it was no secret where the documents came from. The computer security firm CrowdStrike had already published its technical report on the DNC breach, which laid out a trail leading directly to Moscow and the GRU. Analysts at ThreatConnect independently presented evidence that Guccifer 2.0 and DC Leaks were fictional creations of that agency.
But rather than refuse to comment on his sources, as he’s done in other cases, Assange used his platform to deny that he got the material from Russians, and make statements at an alternative theory. On August 9, 2016, WikiLeaks’ Twitter feed announced a $20,000 reward for “information leading to conviction for the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.”
For some, the cryptic tweet was their first introduction to a grim and fantastical conspiracy theory rooted in a real-life tragedy that occurred the early morning of July 10, 2016 on a Washington DC sidewalk.
Rich was a 27-year-old DNC staffer when he was gunned down in what police have described as a robbery gone wrong. The unsolved murder timed shortly before Assange’s DNC leaks spoke volumes to inhabitants of the far right wing fringe, where it’s long been an article of faith that Hillary Clinton has her enemies killed.
Assange fanned the flames even higher on August 25, 2016, when he was asked in a television interview, "Why are you so interested in Seth Rich's killer?"
"We're very interested in anything that might be a threat to alleged Wikileaks sources,” Assange answered. “If there's someone who's potentially connected to our publication, and that person has been murdered in suspicious circumstances, it doesn't necessarily mean that the two are connected. But it is a very serious matter .. that type of allegation is very serious, as it's taken very seriously by us."
Sort: Top
[–] WhyAserverWasBuilt 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Mueller had Chelsea Clinton pick up that narrative and write it in The Daily Beast yesterday. She sits on that board.
[–] solo7 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The Mueller report cleared Assange of working with the Russians. Where the Beast gets off on anything other, means they're nuts/blind/intentionally misleading. People have to remember that the first 200+ pages are the outline or set up for the investigation. Statements such as "there is strong evidence to support" are used over and over again only to bring the end result of a nothing burger. The spinners will spin, but it's up to us to get the information off the report and post/tweet the truth. If you want freedom then do your part....that's what Q is all about. It's us that changed the outcome....that forced people to get mad, ask questions and pass on information that showed truth. Never stop fighting.
[–] iontheball 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I agree completely. Mueller has always been a dirty DS operative. Rosenstein is a weasel who will change colors like a chameleon if he thinks it will save his ass.
[–] intothelightwego 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Rosenstein looked like a mind controlled robot at the Press Conference. I felt that he looked afraid. Maybe he had "failed" in the DS mission given to him to indict Trump? Maybe he already is aware of his own pending indictment?
[–] DawnPendraig ago
All true but I think Andy Weissman write most of that report. And they let him do it on purpose.
I still see Mueller as a controlled or cooperating black or dark grey hat. I think we have yet to see his personal work while he let Weissman and others play their blockade and smear games.
[–] QDPie 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Wasn't GRU C_A? Isn't that what we'll eventually discover? That all those who were arrested were just like the so called Muslims on the WTC planes? You know, the only people whose passports were "found" in the WTC pile? I think history will show that the absolute worst thing to happen to the world will be the C_A followed by the Bolshies. (which are all an invention of the Payseurs...) Perhaps Barrmageddon is the beginning of the end of these shysters and clowns.
[–] intothelightwego 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I agree - there is so much DS aligned C_A horror waiting to be revealed and the true extent of their evil operations both domestically and internationally will surpass all known Evil Regimes.
[–] QDPie ago
If you ever get a chance, read New Confessions of an Economic Hitman. Can't remember the author. He never mentions the clowns in america, but you just know that's who he's referencing. Very interesting from a completely different point of view than we've heard before. Rather than the "regime change" mantra, this is "take them down by destroying them economically" ... bastards...
[–] MolochHunter [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
If Guccifer2 is a Russian, what's his real identity? Is it in the report? On what evidence did Mueller establish this? Why didn't Mueller subpoena Guccifer? How does Mueller's take reconcile with Podesta's own email saying he suspected an INSIDER
[–] nevergiveup2them 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
He didn't. And he took crowdstrikes word that it was Russia. It was the CIA that made it look like the Russians to cover for the inside job. It will come out.
[–] EarnYourVote 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
Right - I have yet to see anyone try to refute Binney's transfer bandwidth argument that completely destroys the idea of an outside hack of the DNC.
[–] MolochHunter [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
well if he's taking crowdstrikes word then he is a fucking black hat
im guessing Q only ever told us otherwise to lull Mueller into a sense of security
[–] QDPie 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Read the Mark Levin thread on here today. He's got it right. Volume 2 is an essay by Mueller and is NOT a legal document. Mueller needs to shut up before he digs his grave even deeper. And Wes Hubbell's daughter needs to shut up as well, or she'll be singing in Sing Sing.
[–] HelloDolly 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Just thinking out loud here. What if Mueller was supposed to put that in there to put the Seth Rich theory into the mainstream? Most people don't really understand what the entire theory actually is. They go out of their way to say "By then, it was no secret where the documents came from. The computer security firm CrowdStrike had already published its technical report on the DNC breach, which laid out a trail leading directly to Moscow and the GRU." To me, that statement begs the question even from a normie, "Why are they letting Crowdstrike make that determination?" I think this part of the Mueller report is more stage setting. It seems far fetched to me that Mueller would set pins like this up that are pretty easily knocked down. Coupled with Barr going out of his way to distinguish publishing stolen information from participating in stealing information, I smell a set up. Could be wrong. I go back and forth on the RR/Mueller thing once or twice daily.
[–] QDPie 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
good point. We keep forgetting what the NPC's don't know. I said, "Well, Seth Rich needs to be factored in here..." to a couple of normies the other day and they said, "Seth who?" Sigh. Try to catch up!
[–] MolochHunter [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
i know what yer saying, but i dont think the 'bring Seth Rich to public awareness' is a strong or clear enough motive for a set up. It would be something far more pragmatic and concrete.
if there's a set up it may be more likely something to increase leverage to make the UK hand Assange over to testify - or to lull the Brits into thinkng it wont result in a big embarrassment for them when all the dirt is public and the Brits involvement in a soft coup attempt against a SUPPOSED ALLY is laid bare
[–] deepstatebug 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I stopped reading the BS 'report' after I read 'Guccifer'. Tracy Beanz spent much time on this
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=kB0zCpNGhVE
[–] MolochHunter [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
very forensic. Tracey does herself a credit there
[–] user17 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It's "mew"-ler not "mull"-er... Pronounce the German correctly it will help you know who he is..
[–] mathemagician33 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
actually, the German pronounciation of his name, specifically the u w/ an umlaut, would be pronounced more like "Muu-ler" (sort of like "moo-ler" but with the first syllable dropping slightly in pitch towards the end).
That said, it's fairly common for German language speakers to replace a u w/ umlaut with "ue" when typing as accented characters don't necessarily translate well (different character sets, etc). I don't think "ue" is the best representation/translation of the sound it's supposed to imitate, but that's just my opinion.
[–] arbennett 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
sort of like Heinrich Muller
[–] TurquoiseLover 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
Now we have to not only deal with steele's lies in the dossier, now we have mueller's lies to add to the top of the pile.
[–] TurquoiseLover 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Who's idea was it to release the mueller report? It's just more made up crap.
[–] emmaD 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Probably over the next two years the Report is going to be shown to be a pile of disinformation. So it's good to release it.
[–] DawnPendraig 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I agree. It also puts news that MSM buried back into the front and center and baits them to bring it up too with tasty disinfo they cannot resist.