You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Photo with baby says mike took her interview at 4 months old. Doesn't mean that's a picture of those two at 4 month old mark, and benefit of doubt judging by the look of the child, I'd say 6 to 8 month old. Still, mikes breasts look extremely meager for an average woman who had a child of that age. It just all is a lot of abnormal. Mothers please weigh in
That looks photoshopped. The female looks to be around age 16. The baby looks to be at least 6-8 months. That could be some girl with a baby that they affixed a photoshopped "younger" mike's head on. That can't be her "interview" picture in shorts and a tank top. FAKE. (Am a mom... so yeah, FAKE)
view the rest of the comments →
[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
[–] mismacheta 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Photo with baby says mike took her interview at 4 months old. Doesn't mean that's a picture of those two at 4 month old mark, and benefit of doubt judging by the look of the child, I'd say 6 to 8 month old. Still, mikes breasts look extremely meager for an average woman who had a child of that age. It just all is a lot of abnormal. Mothers please weigh in
[–] QDPie ago
That looks photoshopped. The female looks to be around age 16. The baby looks to be at least 6-8 months. That could be some girl with a baby that they affixed a photoshopped "younger" mike's head on. That can't be her "interview" picture in shorts and a tank top. FAKE. (Am a mom... so yeah, FAKE)
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] pixelkitteh 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Nice work! Check out the shadows in that first picture... kinda weird.
[–] nevergiveup2them 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Looks photo shopped. Baby has shadow all around it. Shadow on her legs looks wrong too. Plus those are pregnancy boobs? Not buying it.