You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] mismacheta 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Photo with baby says mike took her interview at 4 months old. Doesn't mean that's a picture of those two at 4 month old mark, and benefit of doubt judging by the look of the child, I'd say 6 to 8 month old. Still, mikes breasts look extremely meager for an average woman who had a child of that age. It just all is a lot of abnormal. Mothers please weigh in

0
0

[–] QDPie ago 

That looks photoshopped. The female looks to be around age 16. The baby looks to be at least 6-8 months. That could be some girl with a baby that they affixed a photoshopped "younger" mike's head on. That can't be her "interview" picture in shorts and a tank top. FAKE. (Am a mom... so yeah, FAKE)

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] pixelkitteh 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nice work! Check out the shadows in that first picture... kinda weird.

0
1

[–] nevergiveup2them 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Looks photo shopped. Baby has shadow all around it. Shadow on her legs looks wrong too. Plus those are pregnancy boobs? Not buying it.