You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
0

[–] DickTick 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

It was the Rothschilds? You said that as a fact, but yet the only "real" evidence you have is a bunch of bullshit numbers you pull out of your ass and then change around at will to give the answer you need it to give to support your claim.

In case you weren't aware, that's not evidence of shit.. not at all.

Why couldn't your title just say "I believe it was the Rothschilds and heres why".. that's all it has too be.. but no, you want to spread more guesses as if they are facts and get people to go out and repeat these guesses, while having zero idea what supporting evidence there is and without actually fact checking your claims themselves. You, @SerialBrain2, and @GodsAngell both do the same exact shit. Bullshit click-baity titles that make statements meant to be taken as fact with absolutely zero verifiable evidence to back up the claim. And neither one of you see why that might hurt our movement when both of your ignorant beloved followers come here they don't even read through your entire post, they pretty much just read the clickbait title and then go out and spread that completely fabricated bulshit into the world... I bet if you came to these threads and asked anyone of your beloved followers on the spot what the post was about and then ask them what evidence supports that claim I guarantee you they can't even repeat what they supposedly just read...

Youre both unbelievable

"Be careful who you follow" -Q

0
1

[–] boomeredpill 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

hi mike