AOC chief of staff
Based on a recent clothing choice, Chakrabarti might justifiably be considered a Nazi sympathizer. But really? Well, yes. In his latest love-fest video for AOC, Chakrabarti is sporting a tee-shirt that features a portrait of Subhas Chandra Bose. Not familiar with this former Indian head of state? Here a few facts:
Bose was an ally of Adolf Hitler and met with him personally in 1942.
Bose founded the Free India Legion (FIL) made up of troops captured by Nazi Field Marshal Rommel’s Afrika Korps.
The FIL swore an oath to Hitler and was under SS command.
Bose teamed up with the Japanese in 1943.
Bose was an admirer of the USSR and sought to implement its authoritarian practices in India.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Blacksmith21 ago
Here's the part where we agree - I do agree with The Bell Curve and Guns, Germs, and Steel. Without doubt, science supports many stereotypes. Stereotypes exist for a reason.
I also see social engineering going on in every aspect of our lives, promoting homosexuality, mixed race children, etc. I'm not in favor of any of this. It's all part of a complicated plan which has shifted "groupthink" to condemn any promotion of the white race. It's hypocrisy and it isn't right. The solution isn't marching in the street in Brown Shirts.
I'm also friends with too many blacks, Latinos and Jews who are Patriots to denigrate an entire race. There are systemic issues within all races and religions with the white race being the most persecuted in the US. Purge the bad from all groups.
God, Country, Family.
[–] Inquisitioner ago
This is likely the source of our difference. Ultimately, populations tend towards their racial mean behaviors after several generations even if you do prune out the "bad eggs" of the current generation; a good example would be the children of the few successful and intelligent black familes who still commit crimes and underperform on standardized tests compared to poor whites. It's certainly possible to eventually get all the non-desirable behaviors bred out of a population via eugenics, but there is no reason to bother going through all that effort if the goal is to, in effect, create what a white population already provides. It is simply more sensible to focus on promoting the white populations we already have than trying to elevate everyone else, which is not any obligation of ours. It is right to put our race first for the same reason one would put their family before other families, or their country before other countries. I do not advocate extermination of non-white groups, mind you; I would prefer an incentivized self-deportation program, and after a few decades proceed to major deportation of the groups that remained, allowing exceptions for technical specialists or scientists as all other ethnostates on Earth already do. I wish them well, but i want them to do well in their own countries. Just as I wish well unto neighbors without wanting them to live in my home.
I agree. I promote nationalists running for positions of local office, and attempting to create a disconnect between overbearing or anti-white federal legislation and actual local enforcement, similar to the recent "2nd Amendment Sanctuary counties" in New Mexico. The federal government, as I see it, is already lost, and I look to the state-within-a-state approach as the most viable, least violent option left.
To explain why I feel the federal govt is lost: Trump has allowed in multiple million more hispanics legally (it was 4 million more under his term last I checked). On top of this, whites have continued to have low birth rates compared to other races, which I attribute to the welfare/social program system our country has in place. And on top of this, Trump was the closest shot we had at a president who would mass-deport illegals ("keept hte families together by deporting the families," remember that?), but he hasn't done it, nor has he advocated voter I.D. after taking office. Combine this with how close the 2016 election was (yes, there was rigging, but rigging is a reality and can't be ignored); the demographic changes that have occurred since 2016 plus that same level of rigging nearly guarantees that an anti-immigration candidate can never take the office of the President. I personally doubt we'll ever get a Republican House majority again because of these same demographic trends. So that means the ballot box alone is insufficient to prevent the slow-genocide of whites, because you can bet that once these demographic changes lock things in for leftism, they will ACCELERATE the oppressive legislation dramatically. At that point, either peaceful separation (which is very feasible due to the distribution of nuclear weapons in white/red states) or violent revolution, which I hope doesn't come to pass, but I'm confident good people would win if it came to that.
[–] Blacksmith21 ago
I appreciate your well thought out argument. And I'll be honest, I don't disagree with a lot of your points.
Demography and statistics don't lie. I live in the Swamp. On a daily basis I interact with Black, Mexican, Central American, Africans from every country; Afghans; Indians....you name it, we got it. Certain cultures excel - primarily Asian and North African (non-Somali). The blacks do their best to keep themselves down. The Latinos are low-to-lower middle working class. Muslims generally do well in this area (only 1 lower-middle Muslim concentration, though it housed 3 of the 9/11 hijackers).
All of these other nationalities outpace whites in live birth rates. Based on current growth trends, parts of Europe will be majority non-white by 2050. I am in favor of stopping that similar trend in the US because it won't be far behind at the current pace. Build the wall and stop letting eveyrone in this country.
It's going to take a generation to reverse the damage.