You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
24

[–] HelloDolly 1 point 24 points (+25|-1) ago 

In fairness to AOC, she came to a battle of the wits with a genius, unarmed.

0
12

[–] Zadim 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

She can read, she read hrc's book, she read obama's book and she read michael's book and she read bernie's book "a guide to political revolution".

According to undisclosed sources, she is currently reading Dr. Suess's Cat in the hat and green eggs and ham

0
4

[–] worlddownunder682 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Jees i don't know if dr suess is in her reading level

0
2

[–] hg74rhyd9 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Who sews Sue's shoes?

0
5

[–] Vibratron [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

true dat~

1
0

[–] GodsAngell 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

This is Socialism/Communism at its finest, AOC's comments and attitude. This is exactly what is going on in Venezuela right now. Socialism/Communism can only work with Dictatorships, in case no one has noticed. AOC is demonstrating dictatorship characteristics, where the people are serfs.

4
-4

[–] OmarComin 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

Lol a genius. It should be "an idiot" not "a idiot." And as for reading materials, maybe Woods should look up any of the scientific research into climate change.

0
3

[–] e-traiu 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Maybe you should read up on how to quit shilling. Faggot

0
0

[–] Headwest127 ago 

Scientific? Where you aware that the '97% of scientsist' that agree with global warming, sorry what do we call it now? Oh, yeah, I climate change - because the earth is NOT warming. Anyway, the 97% number comes from a University of Chicago grad paper where the author asked her scientific friends if the agreed with the ideas in her paper. 97% agreed with her global warming thesis. The trouble is, these 'scientists' where mathematicians, economists or international studies 'scientists'. None were climate, biology or any other of the 'hard' sciences. There is a 40 min video put out by Suspicious Observer this week that outlines the flawed data these 'scientists' use to generate their 'science'.