3
26

[–] Boyakasha 3 points 26 points (+29|-3) ago 

I’ll believe it when it happens.

0
8

[–] MagicalMan5000 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

This is the best policy. Having faith in a system that repeatedly tricks you is simply niave. Be cautious.

4
5

[–] Ddboomer 4 points 5 points (+9|-4) ago 

It’s happening.

2
7

[–] StormRider9090 2 points 7 points (+9|-2) ago 

Any day now, Patriot!

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Boyakasha ago 

Q predicted this!!

0
0

[–] fogdryer ago 

C vine has the current transcripts

0
0

[–] Fetalpig ago 

Oh you mean the two shills..the one lady who has volunteers who are ex military, attys,and lawyers..and the paid pensioner Bucani,who was ex Santa ana cop,who founded the company homeland security inc? Your high,your telling me,our govt who is secretly doing military tribunals,and they give the only transcripts to those two,and the zublick guy? Yeah..Bucani had the Davinci boys in his backyard the baby parts sellers and him and his organizations,the cops and his private investigations who get paid to do Israeli cop training in Santa ana california did nothing,and the reward for doing a shotty job on that no brainer was one of three people in the world to disseminate info...that is rich.

1
18

[–] Rhondaher 1 point 18 points (+19|-1) ago 

Sounds like they are getting the public used to the idea of Tribunals

0
1

[–] Phantom42 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Loses the effect of shock and awe. No time or reason for that.

0
0

[–] Rhondaher ago 

I like the idea of shock and awe for Obama, Hillary and Bushes. I think we saw a little of that at Poppie Bushes funeral. Especially Jeb. But our sleeping fellow citizens need to be conditioned. Ours is a movement of unity and care. Our goal is to free the masses not put them in the psych ward.

2
-2

[–] DickTick 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Well thank God you seem to know the nuances of every single piece of this entire world wide operation.......

0
9

[–] AmericanVictory 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

In the context of national security issues and TREASON, use of the word "tribunal" CLEARLY refers to military legal proceedings. He didn't say hearings, Congressional committees, interviews or trials. I am amazed that conservatives can find something so petty to argue against fellow patriots about! Miss America Fist has some very outstanding characteristics (I salute her photo), but she still doesn't get a pass for missing the boat on this one. Most of us know that the tribunals are already in play . . . does she NOT? No matter. She an others appear to have forgotten that WWG1WGA!

0
0

[–] MuckeyDuck ago  (edited ago)

Congressional Committees are Investigatory bodies not Tribunals is what you're saying, and I agree. Those seated in CC are not Judges, or Magistrates. Tribunal is defined as:

1) a court of justice.

2) a place or seat of judgment.

3
0

[–] QisforQuakery 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

Most of us know that the tribunals are already in play

They are not. They are clearly illegal for virtually all domestic crimes. For a civilian to be tried by military tribunals, they pretty much have to be on a battlefield.

The Universal Code of Military Justice spells out who is subject to it, and the cases where it applies to civilians are highly limited.

0
5

[–] Revised 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You must have missed the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uJXFgL-wa0

Go to 26:55 in the video.

Selling uranium to Russia would certainly fit the bill.

1
5

[–] GodsAngell 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

WRONG! Attempting to over throw a duly elected President, constitutes the status of an "ENEMY COMBATANT". The "battle field" is all over the USA and all over lame stream media. POTUS has CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY to round up Enemy Combatants and try them in Military Tribunals.

SEE Q Post:

Significant Focus on Developing Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and Detention Center

2523

Q

!!mG7VJxZNCI

2 Dec 2018 - 10:03:21 AM

DoiTMbpUcAEDYpd.jpg

DmXXl9zU0AAxhLu.jpg

DUp8ThbVMAADatt.jpg

http://www.theintelligencer.net/news/top-headlines/2018/12/305th-military-police-company-deploys-to-Guantanamo-bay/📁

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/03/28/when-it-comes-guantanamo-trump-truly-builder-chief.html📁

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article210304199.html📁

"They are unlawful enemy combatants"

Questioning: Graham > KAV re: 'enemy combatants' [unusual?] Define 'Treason'

EO effective 1.1.19?

DOJ Office of Legal Counsel opinion re: detain re: US Citizen(s) re: 'Enemy Combatant'

Drops combined paint a full picture.

Do you believe in coincidences?

May GOD BLESS those who fight to defend our great Nation.

We, the PEOPLE.

Q

0
4

[–] CTCZ 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Read Trumps executive order

0
0

[–] KarlKastner [S] ago 

Please review the Graham-Kavanaugh exchange at the confirmation hearing.

2
-1

[–] honoleeelu 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Have you ever listened to Gowdy speak? He likes to use fancy words. Tribunal is often used to describe a normal court type setting. It's like calling a lawyer a 'counsellor'.

https://i.imgur.com/27ftarV.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tribunals_in_the_United_States

0
4

[–] summerstormAK 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Gowdy is a prosecutor. Prosecutors use their words extremely carefully, especially this prosecutor. The use of "tribunal" was intentional. Boy, do I hope he's involved in the tribunals as a prosecutor...

1
9

[–] Scoundrel 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

Yup, that smirk tho.

5
2

[–] hildberht 5 points 2 points (+7|-5) ago 

Smirk might be cos he knows its BS and is just getting a rise out of the Q crowd.

0
1

[–] strikefromabove 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

How much did you bet on that?

0
0

[–] Scoundrel ago 

Damn you're dumb.

2
6

[–] showbobandvagene 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

Wut? That clip doesnt mention Military Tribunals. He says tribunal, Which is a very different thing than a military Tribunal.

1
16

[–] sinclair 1 point 16 points (+17|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Maybe you are missing the point of the Overton Window. See, usage of the word Tribunal in a mundane sense, gets people used to the idea of Tribunals. It's like getting your feet wet before jumping into the pool. When Military Tribunals hit, the public will remember the relationship to the mundane. So it won't be such a big deal, and it will smooth over after the figurative executions. It's just a "court of law", right? :)

0
2

[–] KarlKastner [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What kind of other tribunal were you thinking of?

1
4

[–] showbobandvagene 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

An ordinary civillian Tribunal, Every single court case in history is a tribunal, All of them. look it up in the dictionary.

2
2

[–] honoleeelu 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

Have you ever listened to Gowdy speak? He likes to use fancy words. Tribunal is often used to describe a normal court type setting. It's like calling a lawyer a 'counsellor'.

https://i.imgur.com/27ftarV.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tribunals_in_the_United_States

0
1

[–] MuckeyDuck 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Not necessarily. Military is to Tribunal as Oak is to Tree. I can refer to a tree it does not exclude that I am actually talking about an Oak Tree.

0
1

[–] honoleeelu 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
5

[–] anarchrypt 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Definitely smirks through it.

0
2

[–] sinclair 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Would you please freeze frame it, and post a link to the image? I'm not seeing it. I want to see it, I'm just not tho.

0
1

[–] honoleeelu 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Watch this, then you will be able to see it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqZQ9KM_LjY

0
3

[–] DawnPendraig 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

What is the most interesting is people looking for clips from Maria Bartiromo's show show say they cannot find this full clip. It always cuts before he says tribunals to a shot of Pompeo.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] KarlKastner [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

The grin is fairly obvious. Has he ever said tribunals in any other context? Has anyone in the last two years, other than Graham-Kavanaugh?

load more comments ▼ (19 remaining)