0
37

[–] M16Gunner 0 points 37 points (+37|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Sheriff Joe proved it fake as well. MSM was told to berate him and make him look a fool over it.

0
24

[–] Rhondaher 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yes, this was done years ago. They took the birth certificate apart in photoshop and showed all the layers of the document which can't happen with a valid document. They were so stupid they neglected to group the layers into one document meaning all anyone with any knowkedge of Photoshop had to do was put the document into Photoshop and they could separate the layers showing it to be a computer generated document made up of many altered files.

[–] [deleted] 3 points 19 points (+22|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

0
14

[–] BillMunny 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

I always thought that was an in your face moment to the people of the U.S. That TPTB controlled the government and didn't even care enough to bother hiding it. No one ever addressed the flaws, they just tarred anyone questioning the narrative as being a conspiracy theorist.

0
2

[–] antiplebbitor 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] Skunt ago 

Paint. Net is free and uses layers as well. Might be the pdf program they used to "export" could read layers and they didn't realize. Otherwise it will usually mash all the layers together when you save it to a different format than it was created. Just a thought.

0
4

[–] Gorillion 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Hijacking top post link for those who find twitter intolerable/unreadable:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1095409152728416264.html

0
0

[–] letsgoallthewhey ago 

Thank you!

0
0

[–] SkyeVeritas ago 

Thank you. Twatter has recently decided to demand me to sign-inโ€”on mobile. I usually copy & paste login info because passwords are all different; cannot copy & paste on twatter apparently, now.

0
1

[–] corrbrick 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The two firms that Sheriff Joe hired to do the analysis (one foreign, I believe) both found the certificate to be an obvious forgery, and also found the real certificates that some of the Photoshop elements (dates, etc.) came from.

0
14

[–] slumbermachine 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Did this back in 2010 and got called a racist. Hopefully the jihad picture of him holding a gun comes out soon. I still remember telling my wife back in 2008 that if we survive 8 years of that guy the country would cease to be the America we knew.

1
9

[–] Phantom42 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

Lol, back in 4th grade I remember telling a friend of mine this place is going to fucking burn if Obongo gets elected.

8 years later... I'm entirely right. Not only is the country burning, my fucking rage is hotter than Hell itself.

Executions. Public. Televised. Let's make it happen people.

0
3

[–] GhostOfSwartz 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Good to see folks your age awake!

0
1

[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Aren't you supposed to be getting ready for school?

; )

Nice to see younguns around here.

0
0

[–] Tallest_Skil ago 

back in 4th grade... ...if Obongo gets elected.

God fucking damn it.

0
0

[–] ScorchedEarthAnon ago 

So, you get to vote in the next election? Good to have another one on the team.

0
10

[–] fs92c 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, it's literally impossible for a scanned piece of paper from the 1960s to have digital layers.

0
1

[–] zxcvzxcv 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's literally impossible for any scanned piece of papers to have layers. Scans only make a single layer. One. If more than one, then it can only be a forgery. However, when I opened the file from the link provided into photoshop, there was only 1 layer to it.

0
1

[–] fs92c 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

True about any paper, 1960s just drove the nail home ;) Some scanners will identify different sections of a document. But layers - no chance.

Open it in Illustrator.

0
0

[–] fuckmyreddit ago  (edited ago)

The 1960s paper would not be in layers but you could make the original into layers in photoshop in the 2000s to change things. You would actually make several copies and change each one in whatever area you want changed. Then you put it back together. It's hard to explain, but you could change documents in photoshop.

0
10

[–] Mylon 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Why is the document digitized? It exists in layers and the letters are specified, as if run through an OCR program. I'd imagine the birth certificate would be a simple image scan of the document. The fonts could easily be explained by shitty OCR, but I'm not sure why it would make a layered document for the background and such.

0
11

[–] Rhondaher 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It was created with Photoshop by scanning a birth certificate of someone from Hawaii and then whiting out the info of original and then typing in new 8info. Problem is, the original doc was made with a typewriter and the birth certificate Photoshop copy on the WH Web site had computer type rather than typewriter script from a typewriters.

0
4

[–] KillerKap 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

OCD was a shill busted theory... the layers are created. the background even exists fully in tact when the letters are removed. The most damning evidence was the multiple copied characters all over the document. There are pixel perfect copies of letters to fill in words.

0
2

[–] Fateswebb 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It wouldn't OCR doesn't do that. It's faked.

0
1

[–] justAnotherAnon 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Exactly. OCR recognizes characters by definition, but does not change their appearance/font

0
7

[–] Fateswebb 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I did this the very week it came out. Simple to prove. But cool that the guy leaves no doubt at all pointing out that the document contains fonts that weren't even around yet when the document was supposedly created.

0
4

[–] angelCole 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Kind of like Kamala claiming she was smoking pot and listening to rappers in the 80s that didn't come on the rap scene until the 90s. These people are stupid.

0
6

[–] j_Dawg_01 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I've looked at this before with Adobe Illustrator. The layers alone are enough to prove the point that it's a fake. But MilSpec goes too far.

He claimed that with the PDF open in Illustrator he exported it to MS Word and it "came apart." It's only after the document comes apart that fonts become an issue. I tried the same process with Adobe Illustrator CS6 and MS Word for Mac Version 16.16.6.

My version of Illustrator doesn't export to MS Word, it "saves for MS Office" but that doesn't open properly in MS Word, so the rest of the process doesn't work.

It doesn't matter though, the rest of the process is irrelevant.

Original birth certificates from that time were single sheet hard copy documents. Any digital version would have to have been saved from a scan. Scans don't create layers. The idiot who made Barry's birth certificate didn't know enough to flatten the image before saving it as a PDF.

The rest of the issues with the document coming apart and having wrong fonts could just be the difference in the algorithm used in converting for export from Illustrator in what ever version he's working with. Different people may end up with different results. But again, none of that matters.

0
9

[–] OriginalRealityCheck 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

The idiot who made Barry's birth certificate didn't know enough to flatten the image

He probably had Michelle do it for him---she doesn't even know enough to flatten her own package.

0
0

[–] j_Dawg_01 ago 

ROFL

0
0

[–] Blacksmith21 ago 

LMAO

0
0

[–] angelCole ago 

๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ˜‚

0
2

[–] Gorillion 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The idiot who made Barry's birth certificate didn't know enough to flatten the image

The running theory is that the "artist" knew what he was doing, but that the process broke down. This wasn't meant to be the final released doc only the proof, needing final approval from some retard higher ranking officer or political hack. But rather than following correct protocol and communicating approval to the artist so he could supply a correctly flattened and finalized version, the layered version was released to the public. And nobody could correct it because some VIP's fingerprints and reputation were tied to the mistake.

There will literally be paperwork somewhere where the original artist hasn't signed off on the final post-approval file submission. Or there was until the higher ranking officer or political hack had the artist murdered and the paper trail erased.

Classic bureaucracy.

0
0

[–] fuckmyreddit ago 

It was a pdf? I didnt know you could do that. I thought it might have been a .png. That's a cool trick.

0
5

[–] dueces 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Pretty convincing findings.

0
4

[–] derram 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

https://archive.ph/AGKW1 :

๐Ÿพ MilSpec Ops Monkey ๐Ÿพ on Twitter: "After completing the font analysis, I then selected the main body of the document (in green) and literally floated the entire section off to the side in one peice with the signatures in-tact.โ€ฆ t.co/k56pmkZgIU"


This has been an automated message.

load more comments ▼ (21 remaining)