Next Supreme Court Nomination to be a Woman? The Senate Confirms SC Nominations
2671
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
11 Jan 2019 - 2:15:03 AM
If a woman is selected as the nominee does that eliminate the wrap up smear re: sexual assault?
One would think so, but probably not. Demoncraps will come up with another smear.
What other tactics might be planned to block and/or force name removal?
The latest smear tactic I have heard is that Diane Feinstein is going to use Amy C Barrett's Christian/Catholic faith to smear her as anti-abortion, anti-baby killer.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/catholics-senate-amy-barrett/539124/
(Hmmm...Diane Feinstein just flew to China to confer with her Chinese Puppet Masters https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2967208#submissionTop....it all fits.)
Why is the Senate important?
Because the Senate Majority can push through the Trump Supreme Court nomination.
Who controls the Senate?
The GOP.
53-47
The GOP controls the Senate, 53 to 47. The Senate is currently composed of 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats, and 2 independents, both of whom caucus with the Democrats.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_leaders_of_the_United_States_Senate
Enjoy the show.
We hope it is a SHORT SHOW.
Q
Rumor has it this is who Trump will nominate: Amy C Barrett
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett
FOLKS AFTER THIS, THERE WILL BE A SOLID MAJORITY ON THE SUPREME COURT, EVEN IF ROBERTS GOES FLAKEY!
This is also more fulfillment of the Amazing Trump Prophecies by Mark Taylor, that Trump will replace 5 Supreme Court Justices during his Administration! It sounded too amazing to be true when he prophesied it in 2016, but with Ginsburg retiring, which Q is hinting very heavily at, this will be the 3rd Supreme Court Justice nomination by Trump! And Trump is only half way through his first Term!
https://www.silverdoctors.com/headlines/world-news/mark-taylor-the-firefighter-prophet-says-trump-will-appoint-a-total-of-5-supreme-court-justices/
The Trump Prophecies:
https://www.thetrumpprophecymovie.com/about
Here is Q's recent post about how evil Ginsburg is (Q was setting our expectations that Ginsburg would resign soon):
The History of Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Appointed by Bill Clinton
2653
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
6 Jan 2019 - 9:32:35 AM
[RBG]
Why was she 'selected'?
Who appointed her? Billy the Rapist Clinton
Remember [her] history.
Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Highlights:
Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)
Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)
Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)
Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)
Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)
Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)
Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)
Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)
Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)
An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)
Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)
Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.
http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/📁
Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?
What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?
What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?
What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]? Terminally ill?
Who is managing her care?
Who is 'really' managing her care? Hospice Care?
The clock is ticking.
PANIC IN DC.
Q
Good-riddens Ginsburg......prepare to meet your maker, and he ain't too happy with you!
Ginsburg Receiving HOSPICE CARE??? That would line up with what Q said here on Jan 6th.....WHO is REALLY managing her care??? and The Clock is Ticking??? Yep, sounds like Hospice Care.
DC Whispers:
http://dcwhispers.com/alert-justice-ginsburg-not-even-in-dc-as-grave-health-rumors-swirl/
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2967017#submissionTop
Rumor which seems to be confirmed now by Q:
White House Prepares For Ginsburg Supreme Court Vacancy: Report
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-10/white-house-prepares-ginsburg-supreme-court-vacancy-report
view the rest of the comments →
[–] grace8 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Op draws some conclusions here that may be wishful thinking. Q post could have been merely related to the movie glorifying RBG that just came out. Or just related to her surgery. Q's recent post discusses how RBG is getting secret and unavailable to the rest of us treatment. So Q is telling us to expect better than average prognosis.
I do not believe the present makeup of the court would vote against a SOE for the border. Just2 weeks ago they made a ruling friendly to the building of the wall when they refused to hear a case stating the wall was unconstitutional. I'm not sure if there are any other cases coming before it that would require the court to be more conservative at present than it already is. If so, I imagine that Trump can bring her into submission as he did members of Congress by threatening exposure of evidence. Q posted that some congressmen would vote as Trump required until they retired at the end of their term when he posted about congressmen forced to retire.