You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
In and of itself, the word FULSOME does not seem to actually FIT in the sense of the judge's comments...
fulsome (fo͝olˈsəm)►
adj. Offensively flattering or insincere. See Synonyms at unctuous.
adj. Offensive to the taste or sensibilities.
adj. Usage Problem Copious or abundant.
How does that relate? Perhaps did he intend the 'abundant' meaning? Certainly is an ambiguous word for a jurist to use. Generally, they like to make things clearer, not more opaque.
[–]WTFChuck[S]0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
I agree. "Fulsome" is a weird word. And the fact that Sally Yates used it too regarding her testimony is weird. CODE talkers.
But I totally could see the Brit GCHQ picking the name "Project Fulsome" as a jibe at Trump being "offensive to taste or sensibilities". Aren't they so freaking clever? Bet they're not feeling nearly so clever these days. It's so often Hubris that gets these a@@h*les
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Cloudrdr 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
In and of itself, the word FULSOME does not seem to actually FIT in the sense of the judge's comments...
fulsome (fo͝olˈsəm)►
How does that relate? Perhaps did he intend the 'abundant' meaning? Certainly is an ambiguous word for a jurist to use. Generally, they like to make things clearer, not more opaque.
[–] WTFChuck [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I agree. "Fulsome" is a weird word. And the fact that Sally Yates used it too regarding her testimony is weird. CODE talkers.
But I totally could see the Brit GCHQ picking the name "Project Fulsome" as a jibe at Trump being "offensive to taste or sensibilities". Aren't they so freaking clever? Bet they're not feeling nearly so clever these days. It's so often Hubris that gets these a@@h*les
[–] UK_Bloke_Awoke 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Many of us over here 🇬🇧 wholeheartedly and completely reject the actions that GCHQ seem to have taken...
Although POTUS is ceaselessly maligned by our MSM, I know that he has brought many people into the light, as they see through the lies and innuendos..