You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[–]amarQ144[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
They claim a lot more than I will describe here. The idea that the universe is a computer animation is quite popular with all the "for prime time science guys". Every one of them can be heard/watched having serious discussions about it. Every one of them also ridicules creation theory and considers flat earthers plain stupid. That said, not one can answer the question, "if a computer animation, who created it"...much less if the animation is flat or globe. FYI, the creation story was taken from even older creation stories...from a time before this planet orbited the current star we call "the sun".
Yeah I don't agree with those theories then. I base my understanding on repeatable, observable, testable ideas that have merit in reality and can be proven.
The creation story WAS the beginning. There are no "older creation stories" as any other creation stories would have been written after creation occurred.
Correction to an earlier comment I made: Earth was mentioned in the creation story on day 3. Sun/moon and stars on day 4. So still, we have an earth and no sun according to the origin story.
One interesting concept: The Bible claims God called waters to gather in one place so dry land could appear... it doesn't claim God created earth at the exact moment. So: if this is true, and earth existed under the water for a long time, then carbon dating and other dating methods showing earth minerals to be millions of years old would have merit, since those things did, in fact, exist before creation took place.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] amarQ144 [S] ago
They claim a lot more than I will describe here. The idea that the universe is a computer animation is quite popular with all the "for prime time science guys". Every one of them can be heard/watched having serious discussions about it. Every one of them also ridicules creation theory and considers flat earthers plain stupid. That said, not one can answer the question, "if a computer animation, who created it"...much less if the animation is flat or globe. FYI, the creation story was taken from even older creation stories...from a time before this planet orbited the current star we call "the sun".
[–] WhellEndowed 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yeah I don't agree with those theories then. I base my understanding on repeatable, observable, testable ideas that have merit in reality and can be proven.
The creation story WAS the beginning. There are no "older creation stories" as any other creation stories would have been written after creation occurred.
Correction to an earlier comment I made: Earth was mentioned in the creation story on day 3. Sun/moon and stars on day 4. So still, we have an earth and no sun according to the origin story.
One interesting concept: The Bible claims God called waters to gather in one place so dry land could appear... it doesn't claim God created earth at the exact moment. So: if this is true, and earth existed under the water for a long time, then carbon dating and other dating methods showing earth minerals to be millions of years old would have merit, since those things did, in fact, exist before creation took place.
Just an idea, but I'm leaning towards plausible.
[–] amarQ144 [S] ago
The creation was the beginning of the new earth...the biblical story was taken from the Torah,...the Torah taken from The Epic of Gilgamesh.