You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
6

[–] BONFIRE_OF_VANITIES 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Law Dawgs always do their best work when their target is either too comfy or too nervous. Legality I don't think comes into play here. Do undercover narcs have to tell the perp that they are being recorded? And look, I get it. Fuck the deep state and all their satanic shit. But folks need to watch what they say talking anyone. Even you.

0
7

[–] Fishdo169 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Surely though the point is how many people are charged with lying to an undercover agent? Legally how can anyone be charged with lying to the fbi if they aren’t informed that any statement they make is being entered into record... it’s completely different legally if you use an undercover agent to obtain intelligence that will lead to gaining evidence... Though the whole argument is moot... the FBI have admitted Flynn didn’t lie and those FBI agents who duped Flynn had to change their 302s to try to say he did lie... (they just didn’t think they would be found out at the time)now that’s illegal!

So what do FBI agents get for lying to the FBI?

0
4

[–] BONFIRE_OF_VANITIES 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

A paycheck you and I provide. I see your point about the legality of covert actions to obtain more than just talk but..(shrug) ..They have gotten so arrogant and out of control I'm at a loss.

0
2

[–] Fateswebb 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

But what's this about they told him to not have his lawyer present? If he is being interrogated then doesn't that disqualify it? And how do you even say that and not raise suspicions.