You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Could be, just strange. Breitbart reporting Gorsuch expressing concern that some of their colleagues – likely meaning John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh – are “abdicating our judicial duty” because the cases involve Planned Parenthood, which many Americans equate with abortion rights.
Your linked Washington Examiner article explains it on the end in an update and above that. It's not the real case and Kavanaugh didn't want to interfere with a running case:
... But these cases are not about abortion rights. They are about private rights of action under the Medicaid Act. Resolving the question presented here would not even affect Planned Parenthood’s ability to challenge the States’ decisions; it concerns only the rights of individual Medicaid patients to bring their own suits."
This certainly does not sound like a majority that is chomping at the bit to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Update: One Supreme Court watcher writes: "As I recall the history of this case, the first vote for cert [i.e. certiorari — granting a hearing] would have taken place before Kavanaugh's appointment — and Roberts would have had to refuse to vote for cert then as it only takes four votes to accept the case. I assume Kavanaugh did not want to be the late-arriving fourth vote for cert, and that's a reasonable call for a brand-new justice to make.
Sort: Top
[–] JaneQDoe 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
It could have been the wrong case (for the Pro-Life side). There is strategy involved in which cases to hear.
[–] Dandelions7 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Could be, just strange. Breitbart reporting Gorsuch expressing concern that some of their colleagues – likely meaning John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh – are “abdicating our judicial duty” because the cases involve Planned Parenthood, which many Americans equate with abortion rights.
[–] WhyAserverWasBuilt ago
Or the work must be done by legislators.
[–] QuiteEasilyAmused 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I suspect you are very easily distracted.
[–] Light_Guard 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It sounds like he ruled in timid concern about public perception. The reasons states wanted to defund PP had nothing to do with abortion.
[–] Nomobrat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Your linked Washington Examiner article explains it on the end in an update and above that. It's not the real case and Kavanaugh didn't want to interfere with a running case:
[–] pby1000 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thanks for stating the issue of the case.
[–] Truthbetold51463 ago
Trust the plan
[–] Revodude ago
Not really about planned parenthood. About suing the government under civil rights act.
[–] nomorenwo 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
It's not up to him, do you know how your government works?