Archived Cohen's Guilty Plea Isn't Proof Trump Campaign Colluded With Russia (GreatAwakening)
submitted ago by Stonenchizel
Posted by: Stonenchizel
Posting time: 2 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 3/3/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 229
SCP: 14
14 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Archived Cohen's Guilty Plea Isn't Proof Trump Campaign Colluded With Russia (GreatAwakening)
submitted ago by Stonenchizel
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Are_we_sure ago
I completely agree. Which is why my facts are solid.
Do some research, criminals are convicted on the testimony of the fellow liars and criminals all the time. See how John Gotti was convicted. See how Paul Manafort was convicted on testimony of liar/criminal Rick Gates
The basic premise of a cooperation agreement is you are working with someone who has committed crimes and you want truthful testimony from them. For this reason, cooperation agreements require you to come clean on ALL your crimes and if you are found lying the cooperation agreement is voided and the crimes you just plead guilty on expose you to the maximum penalties.
Mueller will also be working from emails and other documentation that show what was going on. It be more than just the word of Micahel Cohen.
As for lying is Trump an unreliable witness? He lied for two years about this deal in Moscow and then just admitted it. What do his lies say about his verity?
Cohen testified in court that some of his crimes he committed at the direction of Donald Trump or to be in alignment with what Donald Trump had already said.
Whether or not Trump had the right to do this business, he absolutely kept it secret from the voters and it was such an important secret that Michael Cohen and others lied about it even when lying would be a crime. It's a lie to say this was not a secret. Trump said over and over again, he had nothing to do with Russia, he had no business there. This was a lie he kept from Republican voters in the primaries and a lie he kept from voters in the general election. Trump did not tell anyone as his campaign removed anti-Russian language from the GOP party platform that he might have had a personal profit-based reason for doing so. This was not simply doing business in another country. This was doing business in Moscow where business is tied to the government and the only way this deal would come off if the Kremlin approved the permits and the financing. So making Putin happy could be profitable for Trump and this was an issue long before Jan 2017.
What did you say about opinions not being true?
[–] Stonenchizel [S] ago (edited ago)
So @Are_we_sure doing business with Putin would be profitable for Trump huh, maybe it would have been profitable just like it was for HRC & Obama & Comey & Mueller & Podesta etc..... What I don't understand about you Liberals is that you think everything corrupt you've done through All the corruption Uranium One & all the other foul shut they've done while making millions, no I mean making hundreds of millions of dollars was OK for those mentioned above... But oh watch out because Trump is the Boogeyman. Unfuckingbelievable!
[–] Stonenchizel [S] ago (edited ago)
OK Hillary it doesn't matter how mad you get, it's obvious you are trolling this GA sub... You will never be president cunt ... Now fuck off!
[–] Are_we_sure ago
Why do you think laying out true facts is trolling? What does that say about this board.