You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
8

[–] Ironbelly 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

as some one who knows crypto very well Bitcoin would not be what the fed would use at all. reason is bc it is a open ledger and trackable. The last thing they would do is push a concept of currency in which anyone and everyone can track the feds and central banks transactions. thats the number one thing that allows them to get away with so much fraud and criminal activity is bc the public doesnt know where and who they send money to only a small percentage they want us to know. Now if they used or developed a privacy cryptocurrency which are already available then the argument could be somewhat valid but to push a privacy coin on the public and successful would be almost impossible to sell to the public. crypto would destroy banks in a big way all the fees they would miss out on and whole nother slew of reasons. making people there own banks and they lose control of people being inslaved by there control. this article is complete fud and full of holes and is only meant to target the uninformed and create a conspiracy if you think other wise.

0
2

[–] eronburr 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wrong on SOOO many fronts.
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/7596fbe6ab358290b79870f53ccf27401bade41013b3254c37a72d52fb3bf365.jpg from here -> https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3474911.html#bottom

Ultimately it's tied to people associated with the NWO. The ledger means nothing if you control the exchanges that ultimately tie to your antiquated banking systems.

Just like how CIA owns majority of the TOR endpoints. It's all their designs to entrap and catch more unwitting participants looking to circumvent the systems they control.

As for the tanking, it's not the first. There's research to show a single user pumped the price when it jumped to $1k. Bitcoin is a zerosum game, the number of available coins will approach zero as some is lost and large companies gain the rest. Miners are large companies, they mine with unreleased equipment and sell it when they have something newer.

Exchanges are large companies that have to comply with governments and banks. Banks bought large quantities I think SVB bought $100m when Mt Gox crashed. It's in their interest to sell when it hit $20k but like large stock holders they understand they can't cash out without effecting the price.

0
0

[–] MolochHunter ago  (edited ago)

exactly

you control the exchanges. Ppl dont HAVE to use the exchanges, but they need to be more tech savvy. So ur 60 yr old mum isnt exactly going to put her savings into crypto unless its in a smoothed out more friendly format like an exchange

and then you're back with the same effective 3rd party liability as holding your cash in a fractionally reserved bank

only the volatility changes, and thats a double edged sword 60 yr old mommy aint gonna be savvy in taking advantage of

0
0

[–] Ironbelly ago 

and you can cash out via OTC markets with out affecting price that is how majority of crypto is purchased and sold

0
0

[–] Ironbelly ago 

unless exchanges go decentralized like the #1 exchange binance is implementing and several others then that voids out alot of that argument. and yes manipulation is in every market especially when your dealing with a low market cap like all of crypto is but thats also in all markets. even more so now with majority of buys and sells are done based on bot algos.

0
1

[–] Ironbelly 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

on top of that why the hell would they want a currency they can not seize or lock funds. there is no way they would give up that control they have built since they introduced fiat and can print at will

0
1

[–] WhiteDragonMage 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The US government seized bitcoins from the Silk Road when it was shut down and then auctioned it all off.