You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
I couldn’t even make it through the original Times article. What I did read was basically the Times whining that they are not able to call Trump anti-semitic because his son-in-law, daughter, and grandchildren are Jewish.
They never once considered the possibility that maybe Trump is not anti-semitic.
Sort: Top
[–] thedarkknight2020 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I couldn’t even make it through the original Times article. What I did read was basically the Times whining that they are not able to call Trump anti-semitic because his son-in-law, daughter, and grandchildren are Jewish.
They never once considered the possibility that maybe Trump is not anti-semitic.
[–] Stonenchizel [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Right! I truly don't think he could possibly be. It was just another one of Hillary's made up Clinton Dirty Style Politics!
[–] theoldones 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
failing so badly they've gone bipolar
[–] Trueseeker_90 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
All the New York Times is good for is toilet paper.
[–] RakerKey 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
No I think that it would smear your buttcheeks too lol
Its basically only good for burning
[–] TexasConservativeFag 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
The same new York times who denied the Holocaust. Lol these people are beyond stupid
[–] Turd_Bird 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Wait the New York Slimes actually reported real news?
[–] corrbrick ago
Skepticism about some event, or asking questions and pointing out shortcomings in a story is not the same as denial.
[–] Cleanhobo 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is amazing... This is implying that they are NOT 'good for the jews'. Amazing news.
[–] Stonenchizel [S] ago
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's why the title stated so.... 😕
[–] Anon1492 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well, that is the standard by which all things are measured in this hell world.