You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

A couple conspiracies around something that modern physics understanding shows as impossible does not somehow make it a fact. Maybe physics as we know it is a conspiracy, but I don't believe that to be the case. Never seen any evidence to support that.

I've seen this before with the 2x range carburetors and other "massively improved" fuel mileage schemes. The fact is that so few of them work. Free energy cannot work. Tesla's wireless power transmission still required tapping into an existing electrical difference or generating that difference (voltage).

1
-1

[–] white_eagle 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I suggest you research and study a little more. Free energy is very simple to understand if you know anything about physics and chemistry. I'll explain one to you so you can start educating yourself immediately. H2O is water. Very good. Two hydrogen atoms connected to one oxygen atom. All you have to do is split the atom and you have the most efficient fuel in the world. It's not that hard to split. Even you can do it with just a few tools. Now go study.

0
2

[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'm familiar with hydrogen fuel cells. It's still not "free energy".

If it's so convenient and easy, go start a power company and make billions.

1
-1

[–] think500 [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Conventional "wisdom" always objects to innovation. All scientific lectures should begin.. "Half of what I will tell you here is wrong, problem being... I don't know which half."

0
1

[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That may be true in many fields, but odds are still not on your side that any kind of free energy/overunity exists. I don't see how you can think it's more likely it exists than it is less likely.