Archived Here we go. Autists will now commence doing what they do. (GreatAwakening)
submitted ago by qintel4u
Posted by: qintel4u
Posting time: 2.1 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 1/25/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 2190
SCP: 86
86 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Archived Here we go. Autists will now commence doing what they do. (GreatAwakening)
submitted ago by qintel4u
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Are_we_sure 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago (edited ago)
I don't have a problem with circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is not anomaly hunting. They are very different.
You can go even further and say it is evidence which it is.
I learned recently that circumstantial evidence is more expansive than I thought. If you wake up one morning and find snow all over the ground, that is circumstantial evidence it snowed, because you did not witness the fact it was snowing even if you did witness the snow on the ground. So circumstantial evidence can be quite strong evidence. (You could still be wrong to say it snowed. Perhaps they were making a movie on your block and used a snow machine to create snow.)
Back to the main question. The condition of the stickers on this guy's van is not circumstantial evidence that shows if this guy sent the bombs or not.