You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
6

[–] WhiteRonin 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Anamoly hunting is used to verify or discredit evidence.

4
-3

[–] Are_we__sure 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

Anomaly hunting is used to shift the frame of the debate.

What is the question we are trying to answer. Did the FBI get the right guy? Did this guy send the bombs? Those seem to be the big picture questions.

Instead the question is shifted to How come this guys stickers aren't faded in the Florida sun? As if that answers the question of is this the guy. The conditions of his stickers don't answer that question whatsoever.

It's a way of handling the cognitive dissonance of this guy seems to a big Trump supporter like me or this guy uses some of the same memes I use. Rather than examine what that means, let's shift it to measuring stickers in sunlight.

0
1

[–] WhiteRonin 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I can see your point but consider that new stickers versus faded one are a way of showing that the evidence isn’t lining up and thus why I commented.

Sure some people are looking at details but in general it’s just to prove this is crap.

0
0

[–] corrbrick ago 

It can be, but it's also use to fill out a complete picture.