You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Look, from out of the past: Tom Foley (D) House Speaker who said: "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this." "Even though there is no evidence," he said, "the seriousness of the charge is what matters."
Thus we find Judge K... caught in the "seriousness of the charge, even though there is no evidence". Problem is that no matter what is accomplished at any hearing, the "seriousness of the charge" gives any Senator who want to vote against Judge K cover to so vote "their conscience" (if they have one). I don't believe Judge K's appointment is a done deal yet. Too much potential blackmail and now cover to vote against.
One wonders if the "Q Team" has provided any reassurance to blackmail threaten Senators.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] docksofthebay ago
Look, from out of the past: Tom Foley (D) House Speaker who said: "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this." "Even though there is no evidence," he said, "the seriousness of the charge is what matters."
Thus we find Judge K... caught in the "seriousness of the charge, even though there is no evidence". Problem is that no matter what is accomplished at any hearing, the "seriousness of the charge" gives any Senator who want to vote against Judge K cover to so vote "their conscience" (if they have one). I don't believe Judge K's appointment is a done deal yet. Too much potential blackmail and now cover to vote against.
One wonders if the "Q Team" has provided any reassurance to blackmail threaten Senators.