You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[+]13936582?0 points2 points2 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]13936582?0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
And wasn't it all just a ploy to gain leverage in order to negotiate against declassification? They've become so accustomed to using leverage to get their way that they've completely forgotten how to actually play by the rules, bring a valid argument, win an election on policy, etc.
edit: I know many of them never knew how to play fair, but let's give some of 'em the benefit of the doubt and pretend things were different once upon a time.
When do they pick up and jail this bitch who beared false witness? Time we start providing consequences to these asshats or it will just go on and on and on.
This is certainly why she has been "uncertain" of exactly when it happened. It prevents the obvious "Dude, I was in Europe that whole summer" argument. The sad part is that if this story unravels any further this chick will be left flapping in the wind by the Dem dirtbags. Feinstein will drop her like a piece of bacon on Yom Kippor.
that's the reason she didn't name the specifics. that way, it's impossible to debunk according to their thinking. Welp, didn't work and now I hope this dies on the vine and the scheduled vote stays on track.
Look, from out of the past: Tom Foley (D) House Speaker who said: "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this." "Even though there is no evidence," he said, "the seriousness of the charge is what matters."
Thus we find Judge K... caught in the "seriousness of the charge, even though there is no evidence". Problem is that no matter what is accomplished at any hearing, the "seriousness of the charge" gives any Senator who want to vote against Judge K cover to so vote "their conscience" (if they have one). I don't believe Judge K's appointment is a done deal yet. Too much potential blackmail and now cover to vote against.
One wonders if the "Q Team" has provided any reassurance to blackmail threaten Senators.
Sort: Top
[–] Old_Man_In_A_Can 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/09/20/whoa-nelly-rumor-has-it-info-has-been-obtained-that-will-100-exonerate-kavanaugh-feinstein-set-to-apologize/?utm_campaign=twitchywidget
Feinstein set to apologize next week?!?!
[–] Old_Man_In_A_Can 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Gateway Pundit now picking this story up: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/former-scalia-law-clerk-bombshell-claim-compelling-evidence-will-exonerate-brett-kavanaugh-soon/
[–] Azurulia 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Wouldn't surprise me. The "jig is up" so they are forced to come out with it.
I cannot WAIT to see how the leftist media tries to spin this one. lol
[–] 13936582? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
And wasn't it all just a ploy to gain leverage in order to negotiate against declassification? They've become so accustomed to using leverage to get their way that they've completely forgotten how to actually play by the rules, bring a valid argument, win an election on policy, etc.
edit: I know many of them never knew how to play fair, but let's give some of 'em the benefit of the doubt and pretend things were different once upon a time.
[–] Laskolurch 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
When do they pick up and jail this bitch who beared false witness? Time we start providing consequences to these asshats or it will just go on and on and on.
[–] Headwest127 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This is certainly why she has been "uncertain" of exactly when it happened. It prevents the obvious "Dude, I was in Europe that whole summer" argument. The sad part is that if this story unravels any further this chick will be left flapping in the wind by the Dem dirtbags. Feinstein will drop her like a piece of bacon on Yom Kippor.
[–] CovfefeFan 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That would be pretty awesome.
[–] SQUIRTISDELICIOUS 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The GOP needs to start kicking the shit out of these Democrats. We are at WAR!!!!!
[–] dmanny77 ago
that's the reason she didn't name the specifics. that way, it's impossible to debunk according to their thinking. Welp, didn't work and now I hope this dies on the vine and the scheduled vote stays on track.
[–] Tmb17q ago
But with put the exact year, month, or day How can he prove where he was. I do not believe her for a second but hard to defend a 35+old allegation
[–] docksofthebay ago
Look, from out of the past: Tom Foley (D) House Speaker who said: "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this." "Even though there is no evidence," he said, "the seriousness of the charge is what matters."
Thus we find Judge K... caught in the "seriousness of the charge, even though there is no evidence". Problem is that no matter what is accomplished at any hearing, the "seriousness of the charge" gives any Senator who want to vote against Judge K cover to so vote "their conscience" (if they have one). I don't believe Judge K's appointment is a done deal yet. Too much potential blackmail and now cover to vote against.
One wonders if the "Q Team" has provided any reassurance to blackmail threaten Senators.