In https://qmap.pub/read/629 Q suggested that John Perry Barlow was not safe.
He died unexpectedly several days later on February 7th, 2018.
So we have 3 possibilities:
- Q just happened to guess that something was going to happen to JPB within several days
- Q "predicted" the death of JPB by killing him
- Q had access to intelligence suggesting something would happen to JPB
Option 1 can be removed because it is such an astronomically lucky guess.
Option 2 can be removed because there is no national manhunt to find this dangerous killer who took out JPB and, somehow, John McCain. Surely the MSM would be pushing this story: Trump supporters following the posts of a deranged conspiracy theorist who kills people to prove his points.
So are left with option 3 due to eliminating the other two options.
This is not a commentary on the motivations of Q. This logic does not prove that Q is not a "bad" psyop. However, I think the idea that Q is just some guy making vague guesses on the internet has been debunked at this point. It is by far the biggest idea pushed by shills and self-important smartass faggots, and it has no logical basis.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] NoBS 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Or he posted his name to make him a harder target to kill because of the publicity. If I had a whistle blower who was known leaker, then protecting him using civilian investigators as a safety net is likely. Particularly if it's the cops who want him dead.