0
6

[–] audiastrat 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

The pope in there now is clearly not acting as a true pope. The second coming of Jesus has to happen the right way.

0
3

[–] Vindicator [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Not necessarily. We've had fake popes in the past. They even excommunicated each other.

0
3

[–] White_pride_cis 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This one always makes me chuckle: Pope Formosus (c. 816 – 896) was Pope from 6 October 891 to his death in 896. His brief reign as Pope was troubled, and his remains were exhumed and put on trial in the Cadaver Synod.

0
2

[–] duhiki 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There were two papal seats, as well. Rome and Avignon. Rome won the Pope Wars.

0
1

[–] slwsnowman40 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They even excommunicated each other.

lol

[–] [deleted] 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] Vindicator [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Maybe because he isn't sleeping. Don't you suppose he has had a hand in drawing the thousands and thousands of people worldwide who are working to stop this scourge?

1
2

[–] audiastrat 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

typical atheist liberal. talking about sex. watching so much porn that's all you can think about.

but in response to what you're saying, you probably see nothing wrong with LGBT people sexing up kids, why don't you like it when RELIGIOUS people do it?

RELIGION.

You're a religious atheist

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] think- 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

and either B17 will be restored to the Throne of Peter

Whom do you mean by B17? looks puzzled

and a Pope who holds the true authority of the Chair of Peter because he serves the Master (Jesus) will take his place

How would this even be possible I wonder?

Benedict XVI was/is a very sinister person, someone from his innermost circle who left the Vatican (due to his gay marriage) said the time Benedict XVI was Pope was the 'darkest and most gay' Popedom in recent history. And he should know.

He was a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

What I'm trying to say is: There have been certainly at least two factions in the Vatican (and beyond) - one supporting Benedict XVI, one supporting Francis, the latter having been successful.

But both Popes are dark persons, and I can't see so many 'white hats' Cardinals in the Church, they all have been chosen by the current Pope and former Popes.

0
1

[–] slwsnowman40 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think the B-17 will make a great pope.

0
0

[–] Vindicator [S] ago 

Yes, the web of lies and disinfo is incredibly tangled. Perhaps B17 is evil...or perhaps his situation was similar to Kim Jong Il and Kim Jong Un, whom Q has characterized as "hostages". To sort through what's what, it helps to zoom out and look at patterns.

As head of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith (the bureaucracy tasked with preventing corruption of Church teaching) under JPII, Ratzinger held fast against the dilution of Church teaching by moral relativism and Ecumenism pushed by bishops of both Europe and the US. The two of them consistently rebuked the abortion industry, the euthanasia movement, fetal tissue harvesting for research, IVF and genetic engineering, which are all part of the Eugenics movement and beloved by globalists. They also continuously harped on the importance of the sacredness of marriage and the importance of the nuclear family as the heart of civilization, and resisted Islamicization calling for Europe to acknowledge it's historical Christian roots.

All of that changed once Raztinger was forced out. Now we've got a pope who pushes globalism, the climate change scam, open borders, wants to rewrite the Lord's Prayer, embrace divorce, homosexuality, and got rid of the Commission for the Protection of Minors. He is the first pope I've ever seen lauded by the MSM, worldly governments, and progressive bishops. He claimed Trump was not Christian because he wanted to build the wall.

0
0

[–] think- ago  (edited ago)

As head of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith (the bureaucracy tasked with preventing corruption of Church teaching) under JPII, Ratzinger held fast against the dilution of Church teaching by moral relativism and Ecumenism

Yes. You can of course, see it that way.

My view mainly focuses on how he dealt with sexual abuse. Pope Francis isn't better though of course, in this regard.

And I think JP II's - and B16's views - on abortion, divorce and homosexuality were too strict. (That's the liberal part in me).

Of course I reject Francis' suggestion to rewrite the Lord's Prayer, think the LGBTQ movement went too far, and I don't condone abortions after the 12th week of pregnancy and the globalist movement (getting rid of the sovereign states, extending and deepening the EU, and, last not least, open borders / mass immigration.)

I wasn't happy with JP II, B16, and I am not happy with Pope Francis.

2
-1

[–] Vindicator [S] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Sorry, 2am typo. B16.

There has been a lot of disinfo about Ratzinger, but he forced over 100 corrupt bishops to retire, cleaned up the seminaries, and gave the Vatican Bank hucksters a serious kick in the ass. He was blocked every step of the way, too. Then the gay mafia forced him out. The people in the Church who take its teachings seriously have been waging a prayer war for years to right this.

0
7

[–] think- 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Sorry, I still beg to differ with you.

He didn't try to clean the Church of pedos, he did the cover-up. I know how he handled sexual abuse cases. It was a disaster.

And I don't even want to mention the huge sexual abuse scandal his brother was involved in, which Benedict also helped covering up.

During his time as Bishop, as Cardinal, as Pope, documents proving the sexual abuse by priests 'disappeared' from the archives. He never helped sexual abuse victims. Ever.

It is not disinfo.

His secretary is part of the gay mafia.

Edit: When he was Cardinal, he headed the Vatican office responsible for investigating claims of sexual abuse for 25 years (!), during which time he didn't do anything to help victims, but most often ignored complaints.

Please ask people who work for SNAP, they know.

http://www.snapnetwork.org/

0
4

[–] 12387431? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I'm really glad Q is on the Pope now.

0
3

[–] Vindicator [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yes, me too!

0
3

[–] kestrel9 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I was wondering whether the 'princes' referred to people or regions (principality) considered Princes of Rome. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princes_of_the_Holy_Roman_Empire
See also the President of France. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-Princes_of_Andorra

Regarding the Pope (not relating this to Q)

the Pope who holds the true authority of the Chair of Peter and serves the Master (Jesus) will be restored.

The Bishop of Rome was honored 'first' among equals in the Church, but still equal with the other Bishops. Western Catholic papacy as most know it, has come to be all that many people associate with pre 1st Reformation Christianity (especially in the United States). But the Western See of Rome was not recognized as the infallible head of the Christian Church.

While the Eastern cities of Alexandria and Antioch produced theological works, the bishops of Rome focused on what Romans admittedly did best: administration.[5]

In the early church up until the ecumenical councils, Rome was regarded as an important centre of Christianity, especially since it was the capital of the Roman Empire. The eastern and southern Mediterranean bishops generally recognized a persuasive leadership and authority of the Bishop of Rome, because the teaching of the bishop of Rome was almost invariably correct, (however, the Bishop of Rome's opinion was by no means automatically right) and the Mediterranean Church did not regard the Bishop of Rome as any sort of infallible source, nor did they acknowledge any juridical authority of Rome.

After the sole emperor of all the Roman Empire Constantine the Great built the new imperial capital on the Bosphorous, the centre of gravity in the empire was fully recognised to have completely shifted to the eastern Mediterranean. Rome lost the senate to Byzantium and lost its status and gravitas as imperial capital.

It was not until the rise of Charlemagne and his successors that the Church of Rome arose out of obscurity on the back of the military successes of the western Mediterranean adventurers. https://orthodoxwiki.org/Great_Schism (note the reference to Charlemagne and the French President in link above.)

Consider which Christians the 'Powers that be' have focused on exterminating in Syria. What happened to the Eastern Christian population in Iraq?

In Iraq, Christians numbered about 1,500,000 in 2003, representing just over 6% of the population of 26 million (down from 1.4 million or 8.5% of 16.5 million in 1987). Since then, it has been estimated that the number of Christians in Iraq have dropped to as low as 450,000 by 2013.

Anyway, that's my 2 cents.

0
4

[–] Vindicator [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Also, weren't anons saying princes referred to different demons associated with the compass directions?

0
0

[–] kestrel9 ago 

Interesting, I hadn't read that, but I haven't had time to dig into it too much. Do you have any links/copy?

0
2

[–] Vindicator [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The Bishop of Rome was honored 'first' among equals in the Church, but still equal with the other Bishops.

This is still true today, which one reason it was difficult for JPII and B16 to make changes churchwide. It's called collegiality. The Bishops have almost total control over their diocese.

0
2

[–] Vindicator [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

As I understand it (and my knowledge of escatology is not deep) the Great Schism will be mended and the Jews will recognize the Messiah at the end. Seems like we're not in much danger of that happening anytime soon!

0
0

[–] kestrel9 ago 

Regarding the Jews...You got that right! lol Regarding the mending, there has been improvement in more recent history, however for a full mending the Catholic Pope would have to give up the power he claims to be above all and the Catholic church would have to deal with the incompatible theology they made up during the hundreds of years of unchecked power they had. Like that would happen any time soon! NOT.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] dundundunnnnn 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The church is built on the rock of TRUTH that is Jesus Christ.

0
0

[–] FashyDash ago 

Ok, then what was he really saying?

0
5

[–] quacker 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

My take is that Peter had just spoken truth about Jesus' identity and deity. It would upon that rock (ie. the rock of Truth) that He would build His church.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] think- 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Understanding what happened behind the scenes when Pope Benedict XVI was forced to resign should give a unique insight into the powers that rule the world...

Benedict XVI has been closely connected to Opus Dei (he even appointed a member of Opus Dei to the commission of cardinals he set up to look into the Vatileaks scandal), whereas another faction pushed Francis.

TPTB are not as unilateral as we tend to think they are.

0
1

[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Dammit, just as I was warming up to the idea of Jew-hating, now I have to go back to my original hunch and go back to Catholic-hating LOL.

0
3

[–] ThePuppetShow 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Pretty sure this ia what Q meant when he said 90% of the public would go crazy. The catholic church is the root of the evil and people will never want to believe it. This is so much bigger that 1 Pope. Each prince is associated with an evil cardinal too. Look at their luciferian ceremonies they've always done. The worship of a idol (Pope).

0
2

[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

@ThePuppetShow - Thank you for saying this: "The worship of a idol (Pope)." I've never understood this. I thought there was one God and thou shall not worship false idols. Maybe it's the "false" part, but Jesus, Muhammed, the Pope are not God. Therefore they should not be worshipped. Seems hypocritical to me.

0
1

[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Do you think they will impeach the Pope? If so, WTF are they going to tell the worshipers?

"Sorry guys, we've yanked Benedict because he denied the existence of hell. Oh, and he's a Satan worshiper too."

Gonna be a lot of suicides/"suicides" if the Pope goes down.

https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=REn8zmPi_tc

2
-2

[–] Vindicator [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

No one worships the pope. Where do you get this idea?

0
1

[–] Vindicator [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well, you're in the right place to enjoy both pastimes, lol.

0
0

[–] Blacksmith21 ago 

I haste everyone, in case it is not obvious.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Blacksmith21 ago  (edited ago)

Just like the niggers so overused...I'm going back to porchmonkey, the faggots, the ragheads, the Bible thumpers, the Pope worshipers, the wetbacks and the gooks. Did I forget anyone?

1
0

[–] RickFlairWOOOOOO 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

also keep in mind Jesus warned us about two distinct evils that work against us as Christians, the Antichrist and the religion of the antichrist, and those who claim they are Jews and are not but are rather a Synagogue of Satan. The Antichrist fits the bill of a Muslim. The False Prophet (Muhammad) came and went and directed others to worship the Antichrist (the Mahdi) who will come and unite the muslim world and invade Israel. Upon which time Jesus will return to the Mt of Olives and deal with the REMNANT of Baal worshipers in Jerusalem first and Then destroy the Muslim nations one by one... I think many of them submit to the Lord who were of Muslim nations I'm not for certain. Look into Walid Shoebat's work. Despite his arrogance and how annoying that can be at times he is overall a pretty serious student of the Bible and I think has it mostly right. It's this segway period we are in that he doesn't have right and he doesn't realize the bit about dealing with the remnant of Baal worshipers in Jerusalem. I dug that up elsewhere. Anyhow study your own Bible.

0
1

[–] Vindicator [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

As Jesus said, "By their fruits you will know them."

0
0

[–] Lovethelight ago 

Just listening to this now....they do a very good job outlining the heirarchy that exists ABOVE the Pope.... I wasn't expecting much because of the title but they seem to be sincere and have researched Jesuits in depth for several years... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jKxLnrkrums

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)