Archived @SwampDrainer Tweet applies common sense to the question of QAnon's veracity and motive (GreatAwakening)
submitted ago by Vindicator
Posted by: Vindicator
Posting time: 2.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 6/27/2018 10:00:00 AM
Views: 516
SCP: 20
20 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Archived @SwampDrainer Tweet applies common sense to the question of QAnon's veracity and motive (GreatAwakening)
submitted ago by Vindicator
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Please point out the common sense in that. All I see is a long list of unanswered questions and a bunch of terms like the enemy, Saudi Arabia, and pedophilia. Where are the answers?
Notice how this "handy grenade of common sense" is designed with the same style and structure as "Q"? This is apparently a "human hacking technique" that has a psychological appeal to the member demographic.
Remember Bhagwan Shree, and the "sannyasins"? At least you guys don't have to wear orange. You can be thankful for that. On the other hand, the orange people didn't have to worry about forever being known on something called the internet as a cult member, because home computers weren't even available yet.
I don't "hate" Q. I just think a certain type of personality type is susceptible to the manipulation technique the Q team is employing. If you're so far gone that you can't see how this is working, all I can say is ENJOY THE SHOW while it lasts. Hope you're not too damaged when you come out the other side.
Do a web search on something like: cult manipulation tactics
[–] FashyDash 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I can see what you're saying, especially about the way the messages are displayed. Quick bursts of crazy hope and the "truth". But a few of those unanswered questions do make sense. If most of the populace was asleep and their decades of brainwashing were working, why spend the energy and resources to disrupt it?
Its like walking through an endless set of doors. I know about psyop. How do I know the information about psyop isn't a psyop itself? First Q is real. Then somebody claims psyop. Then another set of people claim that the first psyop reveal was actually a psyop in it of itself. THEN THAT BECOMES THE PSYOP.
Too much thinking, maybe this is the entire goal.
[–] Tsilent_Tsunami ago
Yeah, I don't really know. But IMO, whether "Q" is whatever he purports to be or not, the style of the operation is very cult-like. I would be less "offended" if it weren't some of our people being targeted by this, but what can you do.
[–] KILLtheRATS ago
I believe statements in the form of questions make people think about what you are saying, where as statements can be ignored
[–] Tsilent_Tsunami ago
Yep, it's a technique for directing peoples attention without giving them specific answers.