0
4

[–] Donbuster 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The "Hate subs." should any of that end up making threats against specific users on people, there COULD be legal issues as a result. There's doxing, and potential for users to post copyrighted material.

0
2

[–] WhiteRonin [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Good Points. Makes you wonder if Putt has a lawyer on retainer?

0
4

[–] Donbuster 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Would explain a bit. I imagine there's also tax law to deal with as well, since Putt doesn't live in america and yet voat is incorporated in Delaware, so that could get pretty hellish

0
2

[–] bikergang_accountant 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What's wrong with gun sales?

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Apparently, illegal ... But I'm not sure ...

0
0

[–] baneofretail 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Mostly california fucking everyone's shit up.

0
0

[–] zombielordzero 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

depends on the buyer and seller, and what the local laws are on the sale and transport of guns across territory borders.

0
2

[–] baneofretail 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There is very little case law developed around internet law with fewer than 100 cases so far. This is still a very new venture and commonly follows that law established by precedent in cases against phone companies previously. http://www.internetlibrary.com/

0
2

[–] WhiteRonin [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Thanks!

I was thinking that maybe voat was more along the lines of wikileaks danger ...

0
2

[–] baneofretail 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There is very little liability to a site like voat, or facebook for that matter. Voat, like the phone company, is not responsible for the message sent (or in this case hosted) on its platform. So long as we diligently remove any items which are obviously illegal, we should be able to minimize any potential liability.