sort by:
new
want to join the discussion? or register in seconds.

top comments

[–] SexMachine 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

CultOfVivian is fun digging. Dreadmorgan most likely posted that thread himself, he's a nobody and his claim to fame is autisticly lurking /ggrevolt/ for screenshots.

[–] XenoKriss 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Sounds similar to the MO of a certain SJW pedophile...

[–] XenoKriss 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

ggrevolt isn't one person, it's a free speech board where anyone can post. Guilt by Association and Collective Guilt hardly seems like concepts GG should embrace.

I'd also say it's arguable how much of a GamerGate supporter someone outright wanting the tag dead is..

[–] [deleted] ago  (edited ago)

[deleted by author at 1/27/2016 8:00:41 AM]

[–] [deleted] ago 

[deleted by author at 1/17/2016 12:56:09 AM]

[–] XenoKriss 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I know enough about saging shit that it would sink and not get traction

Yeah, I don't actually think you do.

Anyway, you'd really have to find the individuals who decided to make those threads and do the digging to get any definite answer, simply posting on ggrevolt doesn't give me mind-reading powers. However, here's my take all the same:

Those handful of ggrevolt people you're talking about DO believe there are numerous prominent people in GG who basically want to hijack the consumer revolt for their own ends (self-promotion, fundraising etc) and therefore are adamant about Policing the tags, preventing anti-SJW activity in general and ESPECIALLY anything that smacks of politics - not to help or protect GG, but to keep it "respectable" in the eyes of whatever Establishment these people want entry into.

Continuing this narrative, other e-celebs (the GAMERGATE WON/IS OVER crowd) feel that they have already exploited GG for what it's worth, and so want to Kill Off the tag before it risks making them Look Bad to whatever Establishment they want to become part of. Of course there's talk of outright SJW Saboteurs as well, but from what I've seen most of the hardline e-celeb critique from certain ggrevolters emphasize the self-promotion angle more than the SJW Infiltration one - after all, Sargon puts out tons of anti-SJW content.

[–] Rabbi_Bergstein 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Talk shit, get hit. If a so-called "GamerGate supporter" is going to repeatedly and wilfully insult an entire community of "gamergaters" (god, how I loathe that term), then tbqh fam, the least they can expect is for those people to get irritated enough to start digging into them in order to find dirt to shut them up and/or reveal why they are so opposed to the board in the first place.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[deleted by author at 1/17/2016 12:56:14 AM]

[–] Free_Radical 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

No.

This latest surge in "digging" threads is mostly created by outsiders who want to create the impression that we're "attacking" all GG e-celebs. In reality we've only criticized e-celebs who tried to harm GG - Hatman for scope-shilling KIA, Acid for ruining gghq, Sargon and CultOfVivian for conspiring with Munoz to end the tag etc. Threads created by outsiders will contain no verifiable dirt and will lead nowhere. Ultimately there's no harm done if there's no actionable info.

Our reputation for "attacking" innocent e-celebs mostly comes from e-celebs who had skeletons in their closets.

[–] [deleted] ago  (edited ago)

[deleted by author at 1/27/2016 8:00:05 AM]

[–] rosary505 5 points -2 points (+3|-5) ago 

/ggr/ has long been suspected of being divide and conquer shills.