You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]XenoKriss[S]0 points
5 points
5 points
(+5|-0)
ago
Notice that the "neutral" is the guy in the middle that both sides are fighting over. Some people like to be fought over, to be courted and sweet-talked.
I've noticed a lot of supposed GamerGate Neutrals acting like this over the past 20 months, especially the likes of Liana K and even TotalBiscuit, who try to use their alleged Neutrality as leverage to push GG in their preferred direction - which somehow always involves GG abandoning the fight against SJWs and going the Ethics-Only route (except when the Ethics involve critically examining TB's buddies Angry Joe and Jim Sterling).
(except when the Ethics involve critically examining TB's buddies Angry Joe and Jim Sterling).
SO true, I can't stand this neutrality that they take, only so they can cover their asses and not look crazy to crazies. No one holds an absolute neutral stance on things intellectually if they are interested. They may be barely believing of an idea because of little evidence supporting it, but they should just state they believe it, but only slightly more than the other belief that could be taken. These people are only concerned with their images in the emotional persons eye's.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] XenoKriss [S] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Notice that the "neutral" is the guy in the middle that both sides are fighting over. Some people like to be fought over, to be courted and sweet-talked.
I've noticed a lot of supposed GamerGate Neutrals acting like this over the past 20 months, especially the likes of Liana K and even TotalBiscuit, who try to use their alleged Neutrality as leverage to push GG in their preferred direction - which somehow always involves GG abandoning the fight against SJWs and going the Ethics-Only route (except when the Ethics involve critically examining TB's buddies Angry Joe and Jim Sterling).
[–] TheSilentSnap ago
SO true, I can't stand this neutrality that they take, only so they can cover their asses and not look crazy to crazies. No one holds an absolute neutral stance on things intellectually if they are interested. They may be barely believing of an idea because of little evidence supporting it, but they should just state they believe it, but only slightly more than the other belief that could be taken. These people are only concerned with their images in the emotional persons eye's.