0
0

[–] nonservator [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The change could help Google tackle claims it sometimes spreads lies. But one expert warned the move introduced fresh risks of its own.

"Jerry, it's not a lie if you believe it."

But it has been accused of providing "shockingly bad" information in some cases, including Snippets that suggested: women were evil the food additive monosodium glutamate caused brain damage anti-fascist campaigners held an overly simplistic view of the world

Oh, well we can't possibly have anything bad said about those Antifa faggots, can we?

"Both Google and Facebook are trying to address claims that they played a part in disseminating misinformation," said Joseph Evans, digital media analyst at the consultancy Enders Analysis...He added Google now faced the challenge of when to present more than one point of view, as it was nearly always possible to find a source that contradicted conventional wisdom but not always wise to present it.

Hey, Joseph Evans: I think it's an objective fact that you should choke on a cock and die in a fire. Although I'm sure you contradict my conventional wisdom, it wouldn't be wise to present your view.

Unlike on the web, links to other material are not presented - meaning a potential source of balance is lost. This became apparent in March 2017, when BBC technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones's Google Home smart speaker told him former US President Barack Obama "might be in bed with the Chinese" and plotting a coup. "People were taken aback by Google saying this out loud," Mr Evans said.

BECAUSE IF AN ARTIFICIAL ROBOT VOICE SAYS SOMETHING OUT LOUD IT IS OBVIOUSLY ONE HUNDRED PERCENT TRUE. How do these retards manage to breathe independently?

And other than food and music, what value is there to Western culture in "diversity"?

Fuck diversity, and fuck Google.