So why is monotheism seemingly more popular than polytheism, why is that?
I think it's because of our "innate" instincts telling us "there must be only one source for everything".
- One mathematical equation to describe the Universe
- One fundamental force underlyinging reality as we know it
- One simple explanation for our existence
- One god
(I might contend the first 2 or 3 but not the last)
Our brains are lazy, this is a scientific fact, they chose to spend as little energy on thinking as possible because the brain is the most energy intensive organ of our body thus the simplest possible explanation of the most complex questions we have in life will more often be chosen than anything more convoluted than "there is one god and makes all the rules so don't question it" - this is an answer most people will be comfortable with as it gives them just enough of an answer to satiate their basic curiosity and at the same time absolves them from having to seek deeper reasons and spend more time and brain energy looking for more satisfactory answers.
But "there is one god and he makes all the rules" is just as meaningless as saying "the answer to life, universe and everything is 42"
So why not monotheism?
For anybody honestly believing (like me) in a Fractal-Multidimensional-Multiverse of infinite posibilities it's extreemely difficult nar impossible to believe in a "one god", there is just no way any "one" being could occupy an n-dimensional space-time-continuum and make everything and anything in it happen.. and at that being conciously involved it it's happenings.
If there was a dreaming-god who would unconciously "dream up" realities and universes at random and never care or even know of their existence I might buy that, but a god that conciously creates a Universe "programmes" it and watches over it micomanaging a single species on one single planet out of countless gazillions possibilities??? could not be a universal god but mearly a local demiurge.
So why polytheism?
Maybe just because my brain has the intellectual capacity for it..
..or maybe because it's a more holistic and complete view of the Universe that sorrounds us?
I think all polytheistic religions have a chief deity a chief god that is the prime mover for everything else and the other gods are mearly his subordinates that he/she outsources specific task fields to that they specialize in. You could almost say that the additional gods are aspects of the chief deity or for simplicity "his/her children". Now I am not saying they are just imaginary but consider that a god does not need to limit him/her self to a single "body" in 1 point of space-time, so the multitude of gods might simply be a multitude of incarnations of a "supreme" deitiy who might not even reveal him/her self at any point and why would he or even if he would, could he(?) without destroying the reality he/she possibly created.
So as you see, IMO mono- vs polytheism is almost a cosm/ic -etic choice, ultimately it's up to your brain to determine how involved it wants to be in asking the pertient questions and getting the best possible answers or if it's just going to accept whatever dogma it's born into and hope for the best driving blindly through existence.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Jobbyweecha 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
If I remember correctly, that's the stance the Hindus take towards their gods.
[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is True. If I remember correctly, Brahma is the spark of creation and Shiva is the body of creation. I could be wrong. I'm not well-versed in Hinduism.