You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]novictim0 points1 point1 point
ago
(edited ago)
[–]novictim0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I suspect that you know that this is not about race but about a tyrannical political ideology that masquerades as a religion.
So why undermine the core issue of freedom and liberty vs Islam with a claptrap concern about "race" which then undermines the real and valid concerns of all the rest of us?
Are you an Islamist? 'cause this is one way that Muslims have tried to undermine the opposition to Islam, by conflating race with religion. Did you know that? Again, are you a Muslim?
[–]Strid0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
novictim, of course race is part of it. Islam just makes it worse. If you disregard race and want to accept millions of African and middle-eastern Christians, we might just roll over and die already. The shitskin who killed a mother and her son in IKEA in Sweden did so coldheartledly and he was an African Christian. I' n not even gonna adress your question of me being Moslem (Which is the proper term for them, by the way.)
[+]novictim0 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]novictim0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I do disregard race but that does not at all mean that I want nonEuropean, nonWestern people coming in to the West? No! We have enough and we don't have the jobs for them.
What we really need to do is kick out Islam or it really will be the death of us.
The shitskin who killed a mother and her son in IKEA
Those were Muslims. Send them back to the Middle east and Africa and Afghanistan. We should accept only truly oppressed minorities who are legitimate refugees (which are primarily Christians today). Those Christians are a small minority on any scale now, I might add. And note that that means that 99% of the "refugees"/migrants should go the fuck back.
So much has to change in our heads first. Namely, we are at War with Islam. We have to face that fact and stop paying Jizya to them in the form of 'donations". Then we need to wage a war of propaganda against them at least as good as the one we have waged by them on us. It should be a disgusting utterance to admit one is a Muslim and follows the example of Mohammad.
Muslim/Moslem, the word is Arabic and can be spelled any which way that approximates the Arabic word of "Submission".
Again, "race" does not need to be summoned like a bullet to one's foot. Culture and need and the danger of Islam are all that one needs to propose the changes you and I both primarily agree with.
Initially couldn't tell if you were talking about islam or judaism! Jews still hold the more powerful anti-semite, islamaphobe doesn't have the same ring too it.
[+]novictim0 points1 point1 point
ago
(edited ago)
[–]novictim0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Anti-Semite vs Islamophobe
Well, the term "Anti-Semite" refers to someone who is against Jews and Arabs (Semitic peoples) for no other reason than their ethnic background. But the use of the term, "Islamophobe", to smear someone suggests an irrational and wrong-headed fear of Islam and what Islam is about.
So "Islamophobe" is certainly a term on the way out the door to the dump. Even Trevor Phillips who coined the term 20 years ago to disparage those that protested the Islamification of Britain now regrets having invented this neologism, says that the critics of Islam were mostly right and that Islam will not integrate, will instead attempt to conquer the surrounding society.
But the term "Anti-Semite" fails to maintain its power because it lacks a core-moral legitimacy. Being against someone only on the basis of their ethnic background, something that one does not choose, fails the test of holding one to account -only- for what they, themselves, are responsible for.
The West is GREAT only because of such fair-minded notions of personal accountability and the personalization of responsibility.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] novictim 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I suspect that you know that this is not about race but about a tyrannical political ideology that masquerades as a religion.
So why undermine the core issue of freedom and liberty vs Islam with a claptrap concern about "race" which then undermines the real and valid concerns of all the rest of us?
Are you an Islamist? 'cause this is one way that Muslims have tried to undermine the opposition to Islam, by conflating race with religion. Did you know that? Again, are you a Muslim?
[–] Strid 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
novictim, of course race is part of it. Islam just makes it worse. If you disregard race and want to accept millions of African and middle-eastern Christians, we might just roll over and die already. The shitskin who killed a mother and her son in IKEA in Sweden did so coldheartledly and he was an African Christian. I' n not even gonna adress your question of me being Moslem (Which is the proper term for them, by the way.)
[–] novictim ago (edited ago)
I do disregard race but that does not at all mean that I want nonEuropean, nonWestern people coming in to the West? No! We have enough and we don't have the jobs for them.
What we really need to do is kick out Islam or it really will be the death of us.
Those were Muslims. Send them back to the Middle east and Africa and Afghanistan. We should accept only truly oppressed minorities who are legitimate refugees (which are primarily Christians today). Those Christians are a small minority on any scale now, I might add. And note that that means that 99% of the "refugees"/migrants should go the fuck back.
So much has to change in our heads first. Namely, we are at War with Islam. We have to face that fact and stop paying Jizya to them in the form of 'donations". Then we need to wage a war of propaganda against them at least as good as the one we have waged by them on us. It should be a disgusting utterance to admit one is a Muslim and follows the example of Mohammad.
Muslim/Moslem, the word is Arabic and can be spelled any which way that approximates the Arabic word of "Submission".
Again, "race" does not need to be summoned like a bullet to one's foot. Culture and need and the danger of Islam are all that one needs to propose the changes you and I both primarily agree with.
[–] neveragainfatty ago
Initially couldn't tell if you were talking about islam or judaism! Jews still hold the more powerful anti-semite, islamaphobe doesn't have the same ring too it.
[–] novictim 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Anti-Semite vs Islamophobe
Well, the term "Anti-Semite" refers to someone who is against Jews and Arabs (Semitic peoples) for no other reason than their ethnic background. But the use of the term, "Islamophobe", to smear someone suggests an irrational and wrong-headed fear of Islam and what Islam is about.
So "Islamophobe" is certainly a term on the way out the door to the dump. Even Trevor Phillips who coined the term 20 years ago to disparage those that protested the Islamification of Britain now regrets having invented this neologism, says that the critics of Islam were mostly right and that Islam will not integrate, will instead attempt to conquer the surrounding society.
But the term "Anti-Semite" fails to maintain its power because it lacks a core-moral legitimacy. Being against someone only on the basis of their ethnic background, something that one does not choose, fails the test of holding one to account -only- for what they, themselves, are responsible for.
The West is GREAT only because of such fair-minded notions of personal accountability and the personalization of responsibility.