You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] DigitalRefugee 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Ha. They couldn't be arsed to spend the 1.5% to cover their NATO obligations which would have prevented the issue in the first place.

This is just another Afghanistan - a way of siphoning national treasure into the pockets of You Know Who.

Watch all these private 'humanitarian aid and social integration' contractors come out of the woodwork. Charging insane amounts for relatively simple things and not delivering. All the while the money - and its power - gets transferred to them.