You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]bfriend130 points9 points9 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]bfriend130 points
9 points
9 points
(+9|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Hmm...no description other that 60ish and randomly stabbing women, the first victim at a pub. I'll take Muslim attacker for $200 Alex. If I get the daily double it will be a Black Muslim.
The BBC describes one of the victims as being "critically ill" - http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-36343415
I know that shootings are jokingly described as lead poisoning but the BBC is serious.
[–]bfriend130 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
Had to look up sarcy. I guess the BBC could be using sarcasm here, but I thought they were just being excessively politically correct in not recognizing Muslim terror. Like in the US when even when the guy is on film doing a crime and admits to it, it's always "allegedly".
Could be a mental or a druggie or both I suppose. Funn though, before I even opened this thread (I thread the correct term to use on voat and reddit etc.?) hmm, I wonder if this is a set-up.
BTW, anyone find out any more about those 11 "white English" suspects arrested for that gang rape a few weeks back?
Sort: Top
[–] bfriend13 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hmm...no description other that 60ish and randomly stabbing women, the first victim at a pub. I'll take Muslim attacker for $200 Alex. If I get the daily double it will be a Black Muslim.
The BBC describes one of the victims as being "critically ill" - http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-36343415 I know that shootings are jokingly described as lead poisoning but the BBC is serious.
[–] Misfit 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Is critically ill not a medical assessment?
Haha. It does sound vaguely sarcy though. Never thought about it before tbh.
[–] bfriend13 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Had to look up sarcy. I guess the BBC could be using sarcasm here, but I thought they were just being excessively politically correct in not recognizing Muslim terror. Like in the US when even when the guy is on film doing a crime and admits to it, it's always "allegedly".
[–] HyperCuriousMe 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I'll hold fire on calling this one. This could be bait to get everyone to jump the gun and discredit suspicion. Still, let's just say I'm suspicious.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
[–] HyperCuriousMe 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Agreed. But they could also be withholding that information 'as is usual' so that they can discredit any 'premature' conclusions.
We'll see, but I withhold judgement until more facts surface.
[–] qdegtjulo 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
What do you mean unprovoked? They were clearly not obeying the sheria law.
[–] Misfit 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Could be a mental or a druggie or both I suppose. Funn though, before I even opened this thread (I thread the correct term to use on voat and reddit etc.?) hmm, I wonder if this is a set-up.
BTW, anyone find out any more about those 11 "white English" suspects arrested for that gang rape a few weeks back?
[–] BaldersNightmares ago
Women walking without burka or women meeting a druggie. Hope they realse some info soon.