Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 5.2 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 351
SCP: 6
7 upvotes, 1 downvotes (88% upvoted it)
~1 user(s) here now
Minimum CCP required to downvote: 10
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: No
Private: No
Type: Default
Sort: Top
[–] Siimo 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Is that blog really citing Nobel prizes from 1900 as a measure of intelligence? We may not all agree about equal gender opportunity now, but surely we can agree that women didn't really have a fair shot at the sciences in the 1910's, when they weren't allowed at most Ivy league schools?
[–] spiraldancing ago
Author probably has a point, but a larger bias that he overlooks is what we (perhaps as a patriarchal culture?) have defined as intelligence.
[–] jackofdiamonds ago
I don't understand why the graph in this article has male scores flipped upside down. It makes it unnecessarily hard to read and compare the two bell curves.
[–] Rummel 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Depends, which race are we talking about?
[–] Siimo 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Ah, Voat.