You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] flyawayhigh 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I posted the "uncut" article. Take a look at why I posted it in the comments ...

https://voat.co/v/politics/comments/1212242

This comment and the surrounding comments in particular https://voat.co/v/politics/comments/1212242/5990176

0
1

[–] OhBlindOne [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I get why you posted it.

I personally am not sure if Trump has actually ever been in the race to win.

Just doesn't seem like he actually does want to win. Especially since he was best friends with the Clinton's before he started running. I don't really know. Regardless, I wanted to point out that those articles were just lowing smoke.

0
0

[–] flyawayhigh ago  (edited ago)

Would this qualify as a correction? Here's the post currently at the top of v/politics. https://voat.co/v/politics/comments/1215499

This post appears to indicate that Hillary Clinton is doing something wrong, or perhaps even violating the laws. Maybe she is.

But Republicans oppose these laws. In fact, there is a very famous case in Wisconsin called the "John Doe case" where state Supreme Court judges who received contributions have decided that "coordination" is virtually impossible, and have literally sealed records of the people involved in the case.

We can't support Republicans claiming Democrats are doing wrong when Republicans are against it being wrong and would repeal the rules when they gain power. then, people wonder why their views aren't taken seriously. Because they are not serious views. :)

There is no commentary about this little problem there -- yet. :D

On a related issue, I like to post stuff that bends the minds of partisans and forces them to choose one conflicted idea over another. Think! THINK!!! LOL

Sometimes they bomb out, sometimes, I'm surprised. Here's the latest success story on this conflicting issues idea. https://voat.co/v/Conspiracy/comments/1214761