You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
the biggest meme for 'God' is the 'Creator of man' and that is the Arcturian group.
as for 'God' the spiritual 'overmind' it's fun to think about an probably easy to get caught up in as humans wander around this 3D plane but as i said before it's kinda like the Ant philosopher pondering the existence of the Ant god over-mind while the Ant nest burns and all the Ant are dying of starvation.
if you are in the 3D plane (weather an Ant or a human) you are playing the game in this 'serialized manner' so if you take actions they are more meaningful than thinking about the 'god 'overmind' so all the thoughts in this video are not as 'valuable' as a meaningful change in just one action.
I understand that education comes from communication and then often actions from that, however the problem with 'happy thinking' without actions is there is a non linear 'credibility expiration' :
it's kind like David Icke talking about 'Reptilians' running the money system but then Selling books and taking that same money as payment. he may have helped a lot of people become aware of these things but , then there is a missing aspect , that actions..
and as time moves forward > the non linear credibility score starts to be affected..
if he for example just wrote a few books then wrote a final one explaining the actions that are needed, and sourced different means to exist on the 3D plane with others though actions it would be a different aspect , however instead it seems that there is just another book... so each book effects the 'credibility index'
The 'Thought plane' is just higher frequency density, as you spectrum across this your thoughts come from you (in my humble opinion)
also if free will exists in any % then it's quite the opposite to what he is saying there actually will always be a 'new' thought (or a variation on an existing one) , just like with the true number of Pi - there will always be a new circle.
it's a good spin on 'God' separating the 'God' aspect the science (as proved by human science) is correct to say that reality is a consensus.
The rest is pretty much his 'confusion' related to 'conciousness plexus' it's still generally correct.
another way to say it is that entities will lower education and think on a 'lower' density and are perceived by some other observers as 'stupid'
I would waste my time debating a ignorant person you may see me do it a lot (on twitter) (but it's not to fuel my ego it's actually to study his responses)
view the rest of the comments →
[–] k_digi ago
'God' is a human construct
the biggest meme for 'God' is the 'Creator of man' and that is the Arcturian group.
as for 'God' the spiritual 'overmind' it's fun to think about an probably easy to get caught up in as humans wander around this 3D plane but as i said before it's kinda like the Ant philosopher pondering the existence of the Ant god over-mind while the Ant nest burns and all the Ant are dying of starvation.
if you are in the 3D plane (weather an Ant or a human) you are playing the game in this 'serialized manner' so if you take actions they are more meaningful than thinking about the 'god 'overmind' so all the thoughts in this video are not as 'valuable' as a meaningful change in just one action.
I understand that education comes from communication and then often actions from that, however the problem with 'happy thinking' without actions is there is a non linear 'credibility expiration' :
it's kind like David Icke talking about 'Reptilians' running the money system but then Selling books and taking that same money as payment. he may have helped a lot of people become aware of these things but , then there is a missing aspect , that actions..
and as time moves forward > the non linear credibility score starts to be affected..
if he for example just wrote a few books then wrote a final one explaining the actions that are needed, and sourced different means to exist on the 3D plane with others though actions it would be a different aspect , however instead it seems that there is just another book... so each book effects the 'credibility index'
The 'Thought plane' is just higher frequency density, as you spectrum across this your thoughts come from you (in my humble opinion)
also if free will exists in any % then it's quite the opposite to what he is saying there actually will always be a 'new' thought (or a variation on an existing one) , just like with the true number of Pi - there will always be a new circle.
it's a good spin on 'God' separating the 'God' aspect the science (as proved by human science) is correct to say that reality is a consensus.
The rest is pretty much his 'confusion' related to 'conciousness plexus' it's still generally correct.
another way to say it is that entities will lower education and think on a 'lower' density and are perceived by some other observers as 'stupid'
I would waste my time debating a ignorant person you may see me do it a lot (on twitter) (but it's not to fuel my ego it's actually to study his responses)