0
19

[–] New_years_day 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Na, man. ISIS is protected by the 1st amendment..

3
6

[–] revofire 3 points 6 points (+9|-3) ago 

Except if I say something not nice about the Terrorist in office. Then that's a fully arrestable offence.

0
6

[–] Hitchslapper 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Obama is just a puppet. Don't waste your hate on him.

0
0

[–] New_years_day 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Not if you go join ISIS, you would probably be able to add the full cabinet to your facebook.

0
2

[–] 2drunk 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

No ISIS is protected by the current administration.

2
7

[–] CarlosShyamalan 2 points 7 points (+9|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Tor and shit is still a thing for terrorists... I mean in the west where everyone has an official adress and all it cant be too hard to find the one that a specific IP belongs to, but if someone in Syria connects to some antenna in the middle of nowhere, the only thing they know is that he was somewhere in the vicinity of that antenna at the time. I really dont think that that out of all the strange things going on around daesh is the one that should alert us that theres something fishy going on...

0
0

[–] Amateur_Wizard 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

find the antenna, which you can, and destroy it.

easy

0
1

[–] CarlosShyamalan 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Too much collateral just to stop them from tweeting dont you think? Daesh isnt the only one using the internet in these parts you know?

[–] [deleted] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I totally agree. You don't destroy a source of information. I'm not sure why people don't get that.

2
2

[–] Craxic 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

Yeah, I definitely don't agree with that. Everyone knows how much crime there is on the internet, so its not like the government can catch you if you know what you're doing. And did it occur to anyone that maybe the government wants ISIS to have a fucking twitter account? Makes it easy to catch supporters who don't know what they're doing with privacy, and its a source of information. We may be being played for fools, but I don't think this is why.

1
1

[–] deathcomesilent 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Bingo, you get it, though I don't think there is any true anonymity on the internet. They call this concept a honeypot, but it also serves as an outlet to spread fear and justify ongoing conflict with regions that are heavily muslim (aka the geographical regions that also happen to have tons of oil and opium production).

0
1

[–] cynoclast 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

No it doesn't. There's an office chair that tweets when its owner farts on it. ISIS having a twitter means exactly nothing.

0
1

[–] ThisWeirdIndividual 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

There's an office chair that tweets when its owner farts on it.

Sauce please.

0
0

[–] cynoclast 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] MrHighBrow 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

When you get trained by the CIA, you might have a free tricks up your sleeve.

0
0

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

If I was CIA I'd want free tricks someplace else if you naw mean.

sorry

2
1

[–] Donald_Trump 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

This is a great source.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
0

[–] ThisWeirdIndividual 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

That's used to spot and monitor sympathizers.

Anonymous is not helping anyone by destroying these information mines.

0
0

[–] AreWeHuman 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

How about a facebook account?

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)