Archived Veterans Today thinks Tianjin explosion was a mini-nuke (veteranstoday.com)
submitted ago by arrggg
Posted by: arrggg
Posting time: 5.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 1181
SCP: 9
13 upvotes, 4 downvotes (76% upvoted it)
Archived Veterans Today thinks Tianjin explosion was a mini-nuke (veteranstoday.com)
submitted ago by arrggg
view the rest of the comments →
[–] VictorSteinerDavion 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'm all for discussing far fetched conspiracies, but mini-nukes?
There's lots of exposition on supposition and little in terms of analyzing the official explanation.
The first question worth asking is not the type of explosive, but why would someone want to do it and can it be achieved without the expense (and trace-ability) of a mini nuke.
Once those question are addressed can you move onto the possibility of a mini-nuke.
What was in Tianjin that required a nuclear cleansing? Who would profit from either hiding or denying resource to chinese industry?
None of these questions are asked in this article and it leaps right into half-arsed explanations of how CCD cameras are effected by radiation.
When your digging for conspiracy, first deconstruct the official explanation and dig into the flaws presented there.
This just reads as grand tinfoil hattery, or disinfo.
[–] arrggg [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Ok.
You mean besides the OPM hack they blamed on China? http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-01/cyber-wars-begin-obama-says-us-must-retaliate-against-china-historic-data-breach
This is an interesting article describing that another reason could be the currency devaluation: http://www.naturalnews.com/050816_Tianjin_explosion_space-based_weapons_military_retaliation.html
Since the explosion China has started liquidating US treasury bonds to retaliate http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-27/its-official-china-confirms-it-has-begun-liquidating-treasuries-warns-washington
China's National Supercomputer Center is located there. http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2015/08/14/ok-supercomputer-chinas-tianhe-1a-shut-down-after-tianjin-blast/
The radiation causes white pixels story was pretty weak, as is the overexposure temperature guesses. The frame by frame analysis of the explosion is very interesting though, pictures of explosions that size are rare. That is one massive explosion. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/26/the-nuking-of-tianjin-frame-by-frame-analysis/
It just blew up is the official explanation, there are quite a few articles posted that are questioning that. It is interesting timing, with the hack and warning of retaliation, just as the stock market crashes and a currency war starts up.
[–] VictorSteinerDavion 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Nice catch, disrupting that is definitely within the scope of the acronym agencies.
Correlation doesn't equal causation, but there are so many event's happening at the same time I'm not convinced these events are not connected in some way. Even if it's a case of taking advantage of the situation type stuff.
Your analysis is worthy of it's own post, as I think it paints a much better overall picture worth thinking about, even if it is all speculation.
Given the hyper lax OHS and overall high risk operation that goes on within china it makes it a very enticing target to help these accidents along, as it's much easier to blame it as an accident if the puzzle parts are already in place.
[–] TheSquibblyOne 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Here is more of the mini-nuke going off in Yemon. There were loads of cameras pointed at the explosion and they all had those white pixels.
This study verifies that yes, cheap CCD sensors are able to detect radiation. That is after all, their purpose. A quote from the summary:
EDIT: The thing I need a citation for is "only nukes have a colour temperature this high" - Note: Colour Temp. is not measured in C (or F, or K). That whole sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Also, a colour temp. of 4000 degrees is not in any sense "high". That's like, the most general of the whole range, really.
EDIT 2: Also, now the colour temperature means it was 4000 degrees Celsius? And only Nukes get this hot. So it has to be a nuke. The entire idea is predicated on the retarded assumption that Colour Temperature = Temperature (in celcius). This is nonsense.