You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] SEC-Shill [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I respect your scepticism. I have files to verify all of it. Which files specifically do you think would help the most?

Re: misdirection: See my comment here regarding the FOIA request to the IRS. Outside of that, there is very little else we have available to investigate that place. That FOIA request could do 1 of 3 things
1) appear to be legitimize reportings for a person trying to stay just under the radar to shelter assets/monies
2) Appears to inflate possible earnings/expenses to which we could assume small laundering operation, possibly even drugs
3) WILDLY inflated earnings/expenses indicating a much larger operation to some capacity-oh hey, look, shady shipping company we've already got connections to and the information on while waiting for the FOIA request to go through. Awesome!

> theories with hard evidence were for a CIA house

I don't ever recall that being the conclusion drawn from the hard evidence. The hard evidence just straight up shows a guy who can't manage a business worth shit. I could be completely misunderstanding your definition of safe house though. I'm going off "is a secure location, suitable for hiding witnesses, agents or other persons perceived as being in danger". I remember someone saying "what if we just stumbled across one", But if you're running a front on behalf of the CIA to utilize as a safehouse; why let LLC and other corporate licensing lapse twice? Still, as of this posting, lapsed.

I would go so far as to entertain the thought that Jose seeded all of this so some nut would burn the place because "damn the pedos" so he could collect the insurance before I can entertain the idea of it being a safe house. Not with the way he's managed it anyway. But maybe I've been to deep into it for too many days. shrug

EDIT: I've added links to the post. Would you require more or is that sufficient?