You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
It's long, but after watching the first 15 minutes of the presentation I was intrigued enough to watch the whole thing. Once you see it, it's difficult to unsee.
Okay, I watched to the 16 minute mark. So you're suggesting the material was pulverized and scattered to the wind? Having mixed concrete myself and having demolished blocks of concrete, I can concur with your suggestion. I still don't know why you posted this thread with a question as the topic title when you already knew the answer.
My title is a question based on the current "mainstream" consensus that the buildings were demolished in a controlled fashion using nano-thermite, and it's that nano-thermite and the impact with the ground that accounts for the lack of sufficient debris (it was pulverised somehow - it's not there). The problem is that there isn't enough evidence of heat (needed to vaporise) or seismic activity (needed to crush).
To save you the rest of the video (thanks for actually watching and responding btw), the premise is that the destruction was caused by some kind of free energy beam (think Tesla) that caused the structure to mostly "dustify" without heat or pressure.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Unchosen1 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes I do!
Here's her 2012 presentation:
https://youtu.be/8jC9W2vbyrs
It's long, but after watching the first 15 minutes of the presentation I was intrigued enough to watch the whole thing. Once you see it, it's difficult to unsee.
[–] realmonster ago
Okay, I watched to the 16 minute mark. So you're suggesting the material was pulverized and scattered to the wind? Having mixed concrete myself and having demolished blocks of concrete, I can concur with your suggestion. I still don't know why you posted this thread with a question as the topic title when you already knew the answer.
[–] Unchosen1 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
My title is a question based on the current "mainstream" consensus that the buildings were demolished in a controlled fashion using nano-thermite, and it's that nano-thermite and the impact with the ground that accounts for the lack of sufficient debris (it was pulverised somehow - it's not there). The problem is that there isn't enough evidence of heat (needed to vaporise) or seismic activity (needed to crush).
To save you the rest of the video (thanks for actually watching and responding btw), the premise is that the destruction was caused by some kind of free energy beam (think Tesla) that caused the structure to mostly "dustify" without heat or pressure.