You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
There were pyroclastic clouds with intense heat. There are photos of some automobiles which were parked on the street, incinerated to almost the melting point. Not as widespread as the ensuing dust clouds.
[–]grandmacaesar0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Where did the towers go?
On the morning of 9/12, "Robert Gurlinsky" explained to George Stephanopoulos that the towers simply fell down into the ground and were pulverized evaporated.
Each tower was 110 stories tall. The complex had a basement only 7 stories deep. The amount of debris present immediately after collapse is nowhere near enough to account for the almost 2 million tons of material.
The usual explanation is that it was pulverised and flew away in the wind somehow. But if that's the case and it was pulverised by heat, why weren't the plumes hot? If it was pulverised by impact, why was the seismic activity the same as that recorded for the demolition of much smaller building like the Seattle Kingdome?
portal into another universe? idk, its a boring question.
a more interesting one is we know why they chose a financial capital of the US (they wanted to strike the jews) but why did they warn the jews? or did they? was israeli intelligence able to figure it out before it happened
Sort: Top
[–] ScannerDarkly 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Nano thermite was used to cut the beams for controlled demolition. It was not used to vaporize the building.
[–] Unchosen1 [S] ago
So where is all the debris then? If it wasn't vaporised, where did it go?
[–] ScannerDarkly 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
If there was “vaporization” of the building as well, that would be done with energy weapons, not nano thermite.
Nano thermite is used for cutting steel.
[–] ScannerDarkly ago
The same place it goes in all controlled demolitions. Into a neat little pile.
[–] nemestrinus 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
There were pyroclastic clouds with intense heat. There are photos of some automobiles which were parked on the street, incinerated to almost the melting point. Not as widespread as the ensuing dust clouds.
[–] Cunty84 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The heat was in the steel frames.
[–] Unchosen1 [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Huh? Were the steel frames insulated? What happened to all that steel? If it vaporised, why wasn't the vapour hot?
[–] Cunty84 ago
The military set it up w/ Mossad, they’re capable of kiking anything to get their way.
[–] grandmacaesar ago (edited ago)
On the morning of 9/12, "Robert Gurlinsky" explained to George Stephanopoulos that the towers simply fell down into the ground and were pulverized evaporated.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/e2vaCySZdmtK/
[–] Unchosen1 [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It's so hilarious that that is the extent of the questioning isn't it?
[–] realmonster ago
the beams werent 1 long continuous beam from the ground to the top floor. they were sections.
[–] Unchosen1 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Is this relevant?
Each tower was 110 stories tall. The complex had a basement only 7 stories deep. The amount of debris present immediately after collapse is nowhere near enough to account for the almost 2 million tons of material.
The usual explanation is that it was pulverised and flew away in the wind somehow. But if that's the case and it was pulverised by heat, why weren't the plumes hot? If it was pulverised by impact, why was the seismic activity the same as that recorded for the demolition of much smaller building like the Seattle Kingdome?
[–] realmonster 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
portal into another universe? idk, its a boring question.
a more interesting one is we know why they chose a financial capital of the US (they wanted to strike the jews) but why did they warn the jews? or did they? was israeli intelligence able to figure it out before it happened