You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] meowski 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Usually when people fail to mention WTC7, the one thing you absolutely can't explain away, I'm suspicious of disinfo.

It generally ends up being people who either want to push no plane theories, or nukes. Looks like your web page pushes B: nukes.

The warhead that hit the Pentagon was probably just depleted uranium penetrator, or explosively formed projectile.

Doesn't look like a thermonuclear explosion at all.

0
1

[–] TheGreatAustralian [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yr way behind the times mate, whatever type of warhead the Pentagon missile had it was a "bunker buster" anyway .. we say thermonuclear demolition charges coupled with conventional demolition explosives that had been built in during construction, according to NY artist Paul Laffoley who was with architects Emory Roth during the WTC design phase, turned the WTC Towers to dust on 911 .. that the same conventional charges similarly built in during construction were what brought WTC 7 down. Nukes at the WTC on 911.