You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
The NTSB report proved it wasnt fire. The model they used is not the same as the video of the collapse. The building in the model crumpled in on itself and didn't collapse at free fall. They basically gave a model of how a fire could theoretically collapse a building like WTC7 but that model does not reflect the video evidence of how the building fell. Its complete bullshit just like the Pentagon attack.
Oh come on. Planes accidents happen all the time without debris fields. At precise angles. And just happen to hit the part of the building which is about to be audited after showing a huge loss of money.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] undertheshills 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
The NTSB report proved it wasnt fire. The model they used is not the same as the video of the collapse. The building in the model crumpled in on itself and didn't collapse at free fall. They basically gave a model of how a fire could theoretically collapse a building like WTC7 but that model does not reflect the video evidence of how the building fell. Its complete bullshit just like the Pentagon attack.
[–] LexOrandiLexCredendi 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
Oh come on. Planes accidents happen all the time without debris fields. At precise angles. And just happen to hit the part of the building which is about to be audited after showing a huge loss of money.
You and your wacky "conspiracy theories".
[–] Darksideofthemoon87 ago
Only after those sections have been been recently "reinforced"